2006
DOI: 10.17221/3940-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition, sensory characteristics, and fatty acid profile of muscle from Aberdeen Angus, Charolais, Simmental, and Hereford bulls

Abstract: Aberdeen Angus (AA), Charolais (CH), Simmental (SI), and Hereford (HE) bulls were used in two fattening experiments with the objective of determining breed differences in chemical composition, sensory characteristics, and fatty acid profile of m. longissimus thoracis et lumborum. The target slaughter live weights were set at 550 kg for earlier maturing breeds AA and HE and 630 kg for later maturing breeds CH and SI. Intramuscular lipid contents were higher in AA and HE (P < 0.05) than in CH and SI, but cholest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
30
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second highest ratios was found in stearic acid (C18:0), that ranged from 22.3% at bulls from 500-580 kg weight group up to 22.9% at bulls 500-580 kg. BUREŠ et al (2006) SCOLLAN et al (2006) introduce the fatty acid composition at the level comparable to our results. The ratios of monounsaturated, di-and polyunsaturated fatty acids within Charolais beef is shown in table II.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The second highest ratios was found in stearic acid (C18:0), that ranged from 22.3% at bulls from 500-580 kg weight group up to 22.9% at bulls 500-580 kg. BUREŠ et al (2006) SCOLLAN et al (2006) introduce the fatty acid composition at the level comparable to our results. The ratios of monounsaturated, di-and polyunsaturated fatty acids within Charolais beef is shown in table II.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Considering both Bos taurus and Nfor et al Bos indicus animals, Bressan et al (2011) showed an effect of diet, pasture vs grain supplementation, but not of breed on protein content of beef. However the average protein content of beef (21.8%) was similar to the values previously reported by many other authors in Bos taurus breeds (Maher et al, 2004;Bureš et al, 2006;Piasentier et al, 2009;Corazzin et al, 2012). Effect of breed on fat content of beef was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Carcass and Meat Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The lower dry matter content of MLL samples in the CH bulls in comparison with bulls of the other beef breeds was also reported in our previous study (Bureš et al, 2006). On the contrary, no differences in dry matter and protein content between Fleckvieh and Fleckvieh × Charolais bulls and heifers were observed by Velik et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%