2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical cross-linking of conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) using poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the most widely studied CP is PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate), which is a polymer mixture comprising doped and conducting PEDOT + and polyanionic PSS − . This material bears with it several limitations, as it cannot be easily synthetically modified to fine‐tune its properties, requires cross‐linking agents to prevent delamination and redispersion in water, and often involves the use of cosolvents and acid treatments to optimize transport properties . When used in OECTs, PEDOT:PSS exists in its doped state at zero gate voltage, affording a depletion mode device that is turned “on” in its default state and is therefore not amenable to efficient power consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the most widely studied CP is PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate), which is a polymer mixture comprising doped and conducting PEDOT + and polyanionic PSS − . This material bears with it several limitations, as it cannot be easily synthetically modified to fine‐tune its properties, requires cross‐linking agents to prevent delamination and redispersion in water, and often involves the use of cosolvents and acid treatments to optimize transport properties . When used in OECTs, PEDOT:PSS exists in its doped state at zero gate voltage, affording a depletion mode device that is turned “on” in its default state and is therefore not amenable to efficient power consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the AFM phase image analysis of the PEO/ PEDOT:PSS composite films (Figure 2d), the hard domains appeared as brighter regions (PEDOT-rich) while the soft domains appeared as darker regions (PSS-or PEO-rich). [12] The PEO/PEDOT:PSS film featured many more PEO-rich domains (domain sizes and elongated structures were ≈50-100 nm) at its surfaces than did the PEDOT:PSS films without PEO (PEO-rich domain sizes were ≈20-30 nm) (Figure 2c,d); both the aligned and random nanofibers provided results to similar those reported previously, with the separation of the excess-PSS domain surrounded by a continuous PEDOT:PSS phase (Figure 2e-h). [26] In contrast to the PEO/PEDOT:PSS flat films, although AFM phase images can provide information about phase separation occurred at the nanofiber surfaces, the phase image signal of PEO/PEDOT:PSS nanofibers may be affected by such factors as surface roughness and surface forces.…”
Section: Phase Separation Surface Composition and Electrical Propermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, for the temperature dependence of the films prepared from PH1000 solution added by PEG-TmDD, we propose the hypothesis that the PEG-TmDD decomposes into EG and TmDD during the thermal annealing, as shown in the following, where the PEG has been reported to decompose during thermal annealing under the acidic condition [47,48]:…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%