2000
DOI: 10.1110/ps.9.8.1503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical cross‐linking with thiol‐cleavable reagents combined with differential mass spectrometric peptide mapping—A novel approach to assess intermolecular protein contacts

Abstract: The intermolecular contact regions between monomers of the homodimeric DNA binding protein ParR and the interaction between the glycoproteins CD28 and CD80 were investigated using a strategy that combined chemical crosslinking with differential MALDI-MS analyses. ParR dimers were modified in vitro with the thiol-cleavable cross-linker 3,39-dithio-bis~succinimidylproprionate!~DTSSP!, proteolytically digested with trypsin and analyzed by MALDI-MS peptide mapping. Comparison of the peptide maps obtained from dige… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
164
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
164
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One major shortcoming of chemical cross-linking approaches, however, is the tremendous sample complexity attributable to the wide variety of cross-linked products that can be created during the cross-linking reaction. To circumvent this disadvantage, a number of different strategies have been developed that have in common to facilitate identification of cross-linker containing species, e.g., by employing isotope-labeled cross-linkers [6,7], isotope-labeled proteins [8], cleavable cross-linkers [9], fluorogenic crosslinkers [10], or cross-linkers creating a characteristic marker ion during MS/MS analysis [11]. Another strategy to selectively enrich cross-linker containing species by using trifunctional cross-linkers containing a biotin moiety has been described recently [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major shortcoming of chemical cross-linking approaches, however, is the tremendous sample complexity attributable to the wide variety of cross-linked products that can be created during the cross-linking reaction. To circumvent this disadvantage, a number of different strategies have been developed that have in common to facilitate identification of cross-linker containing species, e.g., by employing isotope-labeled cross-linkers [6,7], isotope-labeled proteins [8], cleavable cross-linkers [9], fluorogenic crosslinkers [10], or cross-linkers creating a characteristic marker ion during MS/MS analysis [11]. Another strategy to selectively enrich cross-linker containing species by using trifunctional cross-linkers containing a biotin moiety has been described recently [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been partially addressed by "tagging" methodologies that allow rapid visual MS location of cross-linked species within complex peptide mixtures (34,(37)(38)(39). For example, the use of a 1:1 mixture of undeuterated and deuterated (d 0 /d 4 -labeled) cross-linking reagent readily allows mass spectrometric detection of all cross-linked species by the presence of d 0 /d 4 -isotope tags (39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in cross-linked peptide species being tagged that do not yield useful information on intermolecular interactions, such as intramolecular crosslinked peptides or peptides modified by partially hydrolyzed cross-linking reagent (30,40). Moreover, these tagging methodologies make cross-linking studies of oligomeric proteins, such as IL-6 D , ambiguous because identical cross-linked peptides can in principle arise from inter-or intramolecular origins (38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical cross-linking of proteins with variable binding affinities provides a means of assaying critical contact sites (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). For certain specialized cases, natural enzymatic activities may be exploited to serve as highly selective covalent stabilization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%