1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4731(89)90109-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical crosslinking: A useful tool for evaluations of steroid receptor structures and their functional states in intact cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other possibilities are that DSS might not be appropriate to cross-link intracellular PLA # -receptor complexes because of a lack of diffusion in adequate concentrations into U III cells, or due to its chemical structure. Both possibilities, however, could be also excluded, as we could not detect significant levels of intracellular PLA # -receptor complexes when crosslinking of U III cells treated with iodinated PLA # at 37 mC was repeated using two different reagents, glutaraldehyde and DSP, under conditions which have been shown to efficiently cross-link intracellular components in several cell lines [23,[33][34][35]41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two other possibilities are that DSS might not be appropriate to cross-link intracellular PLA # -receptor complexes because of a lack of diffusion in adequate concentrations into U III cells, or due to its chemical structure. Both possibilities, however, could be also excluded, as we could not detect significant levels of intracellular PLA # -receptor complexes when crosslinking of U III cells treated with iodinated PLA # at 37 mC was repeated using two different reagents, glutaraldehyde and DSP, under conditions which have been shown to efficiently cross-link intracellular components in several cell lines [23,[33][34][35]41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings would indicate that only a small fraction of receptor-bound PLA # in U III cells incubated at 37 mC is resistant to the acidic wash and is then intracellular, but may also simply reflect the inefficacy of DSS in stabilizing intracellular PLA # -receptor complexes. In order to check this latter possibility, we repeated the experiment using two different cross-linkers, glutaraldehyde and DSP, under conditions which have been shown to efficiently stabilize intracellular protein-protein interactions [23,[33][34][35]. The results we obtained by treatment of intact U III cells with these two crosslinkers were identical to those observed with DSS (results not shown), confirming the conclusion that very low levels of PLA # -receptor complexes can be detected inside U III cells incubated with ligand at 37 mC.…”
Section: Most Pla 2 Internalized In U III Cells Is Detected As Free Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have suggested that aldehyde fixatives might cause artifactual localization of steroid hormone receptors in nuclei [32] and others have suggested that detergent permeabilization procedures might preferen tially redistribute hormone receptors to cytoplasmic com partments [33]. Brink et al [33] suggested that as little as 0.1% glutaraldehyde prevents the washout of loosely bound receptors from cell nuclei, possibly by covalently linking the receptors to neighboring proteins [34], Al though a cytoplasmic localization of unoccupied glucocor ticoid receptors was reported in glutaraldehyde fixed cells, this occurred when detergents were included with the fixa tive [33], In the current study, animals were perfused with 0.2% glutaraldehyde (with 4% paraformaldehyde) and postfixed in the same solution for 6 h. Permeabilization procedures were not used until after tissue sections were cut by Vibratome. If the estrogen receptor is covalently linked to neighboring proteins by glutaraldehyde in brain cells, these procedures would make it less likely that the receptor was redistributed after the animals were sacri ficed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%