2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical dosing for sulfide control in Australia: An industry survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy would not only represent a significant process cost reduction (further discussed below), but also improve the sludge and wastewater treatment efficiency, enabling maximum resource (iron) reuse while achieving improved methane production. In addition, from a network-wide view, commonly used ferric iron dosing in sewers for H 2 S control 42 might also be useful for CH 4 production enhancement during anaerobic digestion and phosphors removal in the WWTP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy would not only represent a significant process cost reduction (further discussed below), but also improve the sludge and wastewater treatment efficiency, enabling maximum resource (iron) reuse while achieving improved methane production. In addition, from a network-wide view, commonly used ferric iron dosing in sewers for H 2 S control 42 might also be useful for CH 4 production enhancement during anaerobic digestion and phosphors removal in the WWTP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These chemicals include magnesium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, iron salts, free nitrous acid (FNA), nitrate, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, chlorine, and permanganate. There are three main mechanisms for these chemicals in controlling MIC: (1) raising the pH of sewage and hence reducing the H 2 S state sulfide in sewage, such as by using magnesium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide [34]; (2) inhibiting SRB growth, thus reducing the production of sulfide, such as by using iron salt [35,36], FNA [37], nitrate [38][39][40], magnesium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide; and (3) oxidizing sulfide directly, such as by using oxygen [41], ozone, hydrogen peroxide, chloride and permanganate [42].…”
Section: Changing Sewer Tunnel Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os esforços para a minimização de emissões odorantes devem ocorrer já na concepção dos sistemas de coleta e transporte de esgoto, por meio da correta quantificação das vazões e cargas de esgoto, do dimensionamento hidráulico apropriado do sistema, da minimização do comprimento das tubulações de recalque, quedas hidráulicas e volumes dos poços de sucção, e da concepção de alternativas para facilitar as operações de limpeza do sistema (ASCE, 1995;PARK et al, 2014;STUETZ & FRECHEN, 2001;WEF, 1995 (AUGUET et al, 2015;EINARSEN et al, 2000;GANIGUE et al, 2011;WERF, 2007 (GANIGUE et al, 2011), embora a literatura também aponte dosagens menores, variando de 0,3 a 4,5 kgN-NO 3 -por kgS (BENTZEN et al, 1995;EINARSEN et al, 2000;GARCIA DE LOMAS et al, 2006;HOBSON & YANG, 2000;MOODY & RIEK, 1999apud ZHANG et al, 2008RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ et al, 2005;WERF, 2007 …”
Section: Medidas Preventivas: Minimização De Emissões Odorantesunclassified
“…Na Tabela 1, são relacionadas as principais técnicas utilizadas para a minimização da geração de odores em sistemas de coleta e tratamento de esgoto (discutidas nas seções anteriores), assim como as vantagens/ desvantagens e dosagens de produtos químicos aplicadas em cada uma (BENTZEN et al, 1995;EINARSEN et al, 2000;FIRER;FRIEDLER;LAHAV, 2008;GANIGUE et al, 2011;GARCIA DE LOMAS et al, 2006;GUTIERREZ et al, 2008;2010;HOBSON & YANG, 2000;JAMEEL, 1989;MOODY & RIEK, 1999apud ZHANG et al, 2008PADIVAL;KIMBELL;REDNER, 1995;PARK et al, 2014;RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ et al, 2005;TOMAR & ABDULLAH, 1994;USEPA, 1985;1991;VAN DURME & BERKENPAS, 1989;WALTRIP & SNYDER, 1985;WEF, 2004;ZHANG et al, 2008).…”
Section: Análise Comparativa Das Técnicas De Adição De Produtos Químiunclassified