1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01151115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical effects of DCCA to the sol-gel reaction process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the weight ratio of the slurry components was modified as follows: 30% CEL2, 6% PVA, 10% EG, 54% water. The presence of EG, as previously reported in literature, should lead to the prevention of cracks formation during the drying process of the samples [11,30] and thus obtaining an increase of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Scaffolds Preparationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Specifically, the weight ratio of the slurry components was modified as follows: 30% CEL2, 6% PVA, 10% EG, 54% water. The presence of EG, as previously reported in literature, should lead to the prevention of cracks formation during the drying process of the samples [11,30] and thus obtaining an increase of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Scaffolds Preparationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In order to shorten the reaction times and to enhance the drying behaviour of the gel network, Drying Control Chemical Additives (DCCAs) are often added to the sol [3,4,5]. The most commonly used one is formamide [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main cause of such a dual particle size might the complexity arising from the difference in the rate of particle gelation as well as the self-hydrolysis and condensation rates of PMHS, depending on the concentration of either NaOH or K2HPO4.3H2O. On the other hand, the mean particle size of the sample increased with increasing NaOH concentration [29,30]. At higher NaOH concentrations (PS5), the particle size of the superhydrophobic powder increased to a micrometer size (Figure 4A, Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic light scattering (DLS, Zeta sizer, Nano S90) was used to measure the particle size of the samples. Before the measurements, the superhydrophobic powder was dispersed well in ethanol for 24 h. The functional groups present in the superhydrophobic powder were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR, JASCO (FTIR-4100)) spectroscopy and 29 Si cross polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance ( 29Si CP MAS NMR) spectroscopy using a 400 MHz Avance II+ Bruker Solid-state NMR at the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) Daegu Centre. The thermal stability of the superhydrophobic powder was estimated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Q50 V6.2, Build 187, TA instruments, U.S) in a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate at 10 °C/min.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%