1997
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Force Microscopy

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy is an imaging tool used widely in fundamental research, although it has, like other scanned probe microscopies, provided only limited information about the chemical nature of systems studied. Modification of force microscope probe tips by covalent linking of organic monolayers that terminate in well-defined functional groups enables direct probing of molecular interactions and imaging with chemical sensitivity. This new chemical force microscopy technique has been used to probe adhesion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
443
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
29
443
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The substrate UME was biased at a potential sufficient to generate an electroactive species (IrCl 6 2-) from electrolysis of a solution mediator (IrCl 6 3-). The zone over which the tip collects IrCl 6 2-is clearly evident in the top part of Figure 5b (as a current flow at the SECM/AFM probe) and correlates well with the underlying location of the electrode, identified by topographical imaging in the bottom part of Figure 5b. The magnitude of the current measured at the tip electrode as a function of tip-substrate separation is quantitatively determined on the basis of models for diffusion from a diskshaped source (38).…”
Section: High-resolution Imaging In Solutionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The substrate UME was biased at a potential sufficient to generate an electroactive species (IrCl 6 2-) from electrolysis of a solution mediator (IrCl 6 3-). The zone over which the tip collects IrCl 6 2-is clearly evident in the top part of Figure 5b (as a current flow at the SECM/AFM probe) and correlates well with the underlying location of the electrode, identified by topographical imaging in the bottom part of Figure 5b. The magnitude of the current measured at the tip electrode as a function of tip-substrate separation is quantitatively determined on the basis of models for diffusion from a diskshaped source (38).…”
Section: High-resolution Imaging In Solutionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In conventional form, AFM lacks chemical specificity, but molecular recognition is possible by tailoring the chemical functionality of the probe and substrate (6). Often termed chemical force microscopy (CFM), this genre measures the interaction between the modified tip and the substrate by recording force versus tip separation curves: as the tip is brought toward, into contact with, and then away from the surface.…”
Section: Topographical Imaging On the Nanoscalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[114,115]). Force measurements with modified (''functionalized'') microfabricated tips or modified colloidal probes are called ''chemical force microscopy'' (for reviews see [116,117]). Before discussing modification of silicon and silicon nitride tips we mention other tips, prepared by special procedures for particular purposes.…”
Section: Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AFM usage has been limited to passive applications (e.g., pull-off force measurement in the force-distance curve) and can only be applied to the measurement of friction while the tip is touching the sample surface because of an intrinsic mechanical instability of the tip-sample assembly near a sample surface called the "snap-to-contact problem" (Burnham, 1989;Lodge, 1983). During measurements, the mechanical instability occurs when the force derivative (i.e., dFa/dz), in respect to the tip position (z), exceeds the stiffness of the cantilever (spring constant k) (Greenwood, 1997;Israelachvili & Adams, 1978;Noy et al, 1997;Sarid, 1991), causing data points to be missed near the sample surface (Cappella & Dietler, 1999). This has been a significant barrier to understanding the nanoscopic water junction between the tip and the surface in ambient conditions, which makes it difficult, with AFM data, to directly reveal the interfacial water structure and/or analyze it with existing theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%