Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena
DOI: 10.1109/ceidp.2002.1048874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical group in crosslinking byproducts responsible for charge trapping in polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are similar to the values that are reported in [9]. It is worth addressing here that this percentage weight of byproducts per sample film is not relative to the actual percentage of the byproducts in commercial XLPE, as emphasised before the focus of this research is to compare the effect of the three byproducts in space charge accumulation.…”
Section: Sample Preparationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These values are similar to the values that are reported in [9]. It is worth addressing here that this percentage weight of byproducts per sample film is not relative to the actual percentage of the byproducts in commercial XLPE, as emphasised before the focus of this research is to compare the effect of the three byproducts in space charge accumulation.…”
Section: Sample Preparationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Firstly, the interfacial area between the OvPOSS nanofiller and the base PP is significantly increased in the bulk of nanocomposites due to the smaller size of the OvPOSS nanofiller compared to some traditional inorganic nanofillers. As a result, interface energy is dramatically raised, and more deep traps can be introduced into the matrix material [2]. Secondly, when the charges flow through the insulation material, the deep traps with high density would reduce the charge injection and trap the charge carriers so that the mobility of hot electrons could be decreased significantly in the solid insulation materials (see Figures 5 and 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XLPE, on the other hand, is manufactured through the crosslinking process of LDPE to achieve better mechanical properties and thermal stability than those of LDPE. However, some crosslinking impurities, including cumyl alcohol, phenol, and acetophenone, would be introduced into the bulk material and these might shorten the lifespan of XLPE in the long‐term when used under HVDC [2]. Additionally, it is difficult to recycle XLPE due to its thermoset classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very clear that these give rise to significantly increased charge accumulation and there may be a case for not using PE containing such products for HVDC applications. Hirai et al [69] soaked an additive-free lowdensity polyethylene sheet in various liquid chemicals corresponding to crosslinking by-products and the space charge distribution inside the sheet was measured under DC voltage application. They concluded that the hydroxyl group in the cumyl alcohol was responsible for carrier trapping.…”
Section: Space Charge Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%