Chemical Interface Damping of Surface Plasmon Resonances

Abstract

Conspectus Metal nanoparticles have been utilized for a vast amount of plasmon enhanced spectroscopies and energy conversion devices. Their unique optical properties allow them to be used across the UV–vis-NIR spectrum tuned by their size, shape, and material. In addition to utility in enhanced spectroscopy and energy/charge transfer, the plasmon resonance of metal nanoparticles is sensitive to its surrounding environment in several ways. The local refractive index determines the resonance wavelength, but plasmon damping, as indicated by the homogeneous line width, also depends on the surface properties of the metal nanoparticles. Plasmon oscillations can decay through interband, intraband, radiation, and surface damping. While the first three damping mechanisms can be modeled based on bulk dielectric data using electromagnetic simulations, surface damping does not depend on the material properties of the nanoparticle alone but rather on the interface composition between the nanoparticle and its surrounding environment. In this Account, we will discuss three different metal nanoparticle interfaces, identifying the surface damping contribution from chemical interface damping and how it manifests itself in different interface types. On the way to uncovering the various damping contributions, we use three different single-particle spectroscopic techniques that are essential to measuring homogeneous plasmon line widths: darkfield scattering, photothermal heterodyne imaging, and photoluminescence microscopies. Obtaining the homogeneous plasmon spectrum through single-particle spectroscopy is paramount to measuring changes in plasmon damping, where even minor size and shape heterogeneities can completely obfuscate the broadening caused by surface damping. Using darkfield scattering spectroscopy, we first describe a model for chemical interface damping by expanding upon the surface damping contribution to the plasmon resonance line width to include additional influences due to adsorbed molecules. Based on the understanding of chemical interface damping as a surface damping mechanism, we then carefully compare how two molecular isomers lead to greatly different damping rates upon adsorption to gold nanorods due to differences in the formation of image dipoles within the metal nanoparticles. This plasmon damping dependence on the chemical identity of the interface is strongly correlated with the chemical’s electronegativity. A similar damping trend is observed for metal oxide semiconductors, where the metal oxide with greater electron affinity leads to larger interface damping. However, in this case, the mechanism is different for the metal oxide interfaces, as damping occurs through charge transfer into interfacial states. Finally, the damping effect of catalytic metal nanoislands on gold nanorods is compared for the three spectroscopic methods mentioned. Through correlated single-particle scattering, absorption, and photoluminescence spectroscopy, the mechanism for metal–metal interface damping is determined most likely...

Chiral Generation of Hot Carriers for Polarization-Sensitive Plasmonic Photocatalysis with Hybrid Nanostructures

“…For such objects, the slight redshift in the extinction signature (maximum centered at ~550 nm) is accompanied by a small damping in the intensity (full lines in Figure 1d), which is ascribed to the modi cations of the dielectric environment surrounding the plasmonic component. 29 The CD response also shows a redshift in the maxima: the signals are centered at 533 and 594 nm for the L-SiO 2 @Au@TiO 2 hybrids and at 531 and 588 nm for R-SiO 2 @Au@TiO 2 (full lines in Figure 1e). Here, the sign reversal is also shifted to ~555 nm for both samples.…”

Plasmon–Exciton Coupling Effect on Plasmon Damping

“…[ 16 ] But, conventional scattering linewidth broadening by itself cannot determine the relative contributions of these two plasmon damping pathways. [ 17 ] By the in situ single‐particle spectroscopy, we can compare the scattering spectra of the same single GNRs on the glass, monolayer graphene, thin h BN flake, and the h BN/graphene, as shown in Figure 3d,e. The scattering intensity of the same GNRs on the h BN/graphene decreases obviously than that on the h BN due to the interaction between the GNR and graphene.…”

Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

“… 81–83 Importantly, AuNPs can change their absorption and scattering cross sections and spectrums (from visible to near-infrared (NIR) region) by changing their size, shapes and adjacent environment. 84 , 85 For instance, the transition efficiency of rod-shaped AuNPs can be tuned by changing their aspect ratio of length to diameter. 86 A similar effect can also be achieved in shell-shaped AuNPs by changing the relative ratio of core radius and shell thickness.…”