2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical looping combustion integrated Organic Rankine Cycled biomass-fired power plant – Energy and exergy analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of a combined system of bio-CLC and an organic Rankine cycle were studied by two different research groups. 123,124 Both works evaluated a net energy efficiency of about 19% that is higher than the average electrical efficiency of small-scale biomass-based CHP (17%) reported by Intelligent Energy Europe. 125 Moreover, the overall thermal efficiency was reported to reach 21% at 30 MPa for a bio-CLC/supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycle system for power generation.…”
Section: Evaluation System Integration and Techno-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The performance of a combined system of bio-CLC and an organic Rankine cycle were studied by two different research groups. 123,124 Both works evaluated a net energy efficiency of about 19% that is higher than the average electrical efficiency of small-scale biomass-based CHP (17%) reported by Intelligent Energy Europe. 125 Moreover, the overall thermal efficiency was reported to reach 21% at 30 MPa for a bio-CLC/supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycle system for power generation.…”
Section: Evaluation System Integration and Techno-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is because the power generation efficiencies calculated from the literature are 24.2% for the SRC and 11.4% for the ORC. 35,40 This suggests that the difference in power generation efficiency is the main reason for the difference in RtE and costs.…”
Section: Influence Of Fluidized Bed Volume Bed Height/diameter Ratio ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is imperative to find a carbon capture technology with low energy consumption for power plants to gain high electricity generation efficiency. Chemical looping combustion (CLC) presents itself as a promising technology due to its low energy penalty which is associated with its inherent CO2 capture process [18,19]. Therefore, coal-based CLC power plants with CO2 capture could be suggested as an alternative power generation technology compared to USC power plants with CO2 capture (Amine-based), IGCC power plants with CO2 capture (chemical/physical processes such as MEA, Selexol and Rectisol, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most evaluations and comparisons (energy efficiency, economic, and environmental aspects) of the CLC power plant generally were focused on the power plant operation stage. For example, the efficiency performance of chemical looping combustion power generation systems is estimated by using energy and exergy analysis approaches [27][28][29],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%