2021
DOI: 10.5658/wood.2021.49.3.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical, Mechanical, Thermal, and Colorimetric Features of the Thermally Treated Eucalyptus grandis Wood Planted in Brazil

Abstract: This article aimed at thermally treating and charactering the Eucalyptus grandis wood under three different temperatures. For this, pristine eucalypt samples were treated by heating in a laboratory oven at 160 °C, 200 °C and 240 °C, always for 2 h. Treatment parameters (based on weight percentage loss and specific gravity), as well as mechanical (by hardness tests), chemical (by infrared spectroscopy), thermal (by thermogravimetry), and colorimetric (by CIELab method) features were evaluated. Compared to the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adhesive cure of approximately 100 °C obtained in the DSC is compatible with the temperature used in several papers [8,24,32], which reported a typical temperature and average pressing time of 100 °C and 10 min for the production of OSB using the twocomponent vegetable polyurethane adhesive derived from castor oil. In view of this, an isotherm was initially performed at 100 °C to check the adhesive curing behavior, where The values found are compatible with those published in the research by Schulz et al [48], which heat-treated and characterized Eucalyptus grandis wood at three different temperatures (i.e., 160 • C, 200 • C, and 240 • C). Regarding the thermogravimetric curves (i.e., TGA and DTG) obtained, it was verified that these can be divided into three regions, where region I is related to moisture loss (from 20 • C to 100 • C), region II is related to the degradation in hemicellulose and cellulose (from 160 • C to 480 • C), and region III is related to the degradation in cellulose and lignin (from 450 • C to 600 • C).…”
Section: Dscsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The adhesive cure of approximately 100 °C obtained in the DSC is compatible with the temperature used in several papers [8,24,32], which reported a typical temperature and average pressing time of 100 °C and 10 min for the production of OSB using the twocomponent vegetable polyurethane adhesive derived from castor oil. In view of this, an isotherm was initially performed at 100 °C to check the adhesive curing behavior, where The values found are compatible with those published in the research by Schulz et al [48], which heat-treated and characterized Eucalyptus grandis wood at three different temperatures (i.e., 160 • C, 200 • C, and 240 • C). Regarding the thermogravimetric curves (i.e., TGA and DTG) obtained, it was verified that these can be divided into three regions, where region I is related to moisture loss (from 20 • C to 100 • C), region II is related to the degradation in hemicellulose and cellulose (from 160 • C to 480 • C), and region III is related to the degradation in cellulose and lignin (from 450 • C to 600 • C).…”
Section: Dscsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The combination of water removal and degradation of chemical components resulted in weight reduction in the heat-treated wood (Cahyono et al, 2022;Dos Santos et al, 2014;Kim et al, 2018;Schulz et al, 2021). This mechanism tended to affect the density after heat treatments.…”
Section: Density Weight Percent Gain and Weight Loss Changes During T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific gravity KS F 2198 Ahn et al, 2021;Darwis et al, 2023;Hadi et al, 2019Hadi et al, , 2022Iswanto et al, 2017;Kang et al, 2023;Kim, 2018, 2019;Maulana et al, 2017;Nawawi et al, 2023;Özcan and Korkmaz, 2019;Pari et al, 2023;Park et al, 2015aPark et al, , 2015bPark et al, , 2016Park et al, , 2018Priadi et al, 2021;Savero et al, 2020;Schulz et al, 2021;Seta et al, 2023;Trisatya et al, 2023 Shrinkage KS F 2203…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bending strength KS F 2208 Cha et al, 2022;Darwis et al, 2023;Fujimoto et al, 2021;Hadi et al, 2019Hadi et al, , 2022Iswanto et al, 2017;Kang et al, 2023;Kim et al, 2020;Lee and Jang, 2023;Lee and Oh, 2023;Liu et al, 2022;Maulana et al, 2017;Oh, 2021Oh, , 2022Özcan and Korkmaz, 2019;Park et al, 2015bPark et al, , 2016Qi et al, 2019;Savero et al, 2020;Schulz et al, 2021;Song and Kim, 2023;Sumardi et al, 2022;Trisatya et Huh et al, 2022;Iswanto et al, 2021;Jain et al, 2022;Jung et al, 2019Jung et al, , 2021Jung et al, , 2022Manurung et al, 2019;Maulana et al, 2021;Maulina et al, 2020;Min et al, 2019;Purnawati et al, 2018;Seo et al, 2020 Extractives ASTM E 1690…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesunclassified