Biotechnological Strategies for Effective Remediation of Polluted Soils 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2420-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Methods of Soil Remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce or even eliminate the risks of these hazardous elements in the environment different physicochemical remediation approaches (i.e., soil washing, adsorption, biosorption, precipitation, and chelation with alginates, citrates, flavonoids, and phytic acid) have been developed [3]. However, it turned out that these methods hold significant limitations leading to the disturbance of ecosystems, e.g., altering the biological and physicochemical properties of soil and/or negatively affecting indigenous soil microbial communities [4]. As an alternative to physicochemical remediation methods, a biological innovative, environmentally friendly, and cost-efficient tool, based on the usage of vascular plants to extract, sequester, and/or detoxify pollutants, generally termed as phytoremediation, has been developed [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce or even eliminate the risks of these hazardous elements in the environment different physicochemical remediation approaches (i.e., soil washing, adsorption, biosorption, precipitation, and chelation with alginates, citrates, flavonoids, and phytic acid) have been developed [3]. However, it turned out that these methods hold significant limitations leading to the disturbance of ecosystems, e.g., altering the biological and physicochemical properties of soil and/or negatively affecting indigenous soil microbial communities [4]. As an alternative to physicochemical remediation methods, a biological innovative, environmentally friendly, and cost-efficient tool, based on the usage of vascular plants to extract, sequester, and/or detoxify pollutants, generally termed as phytoremediation, has been developed [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent years, NMs have been integrated with biological processes to accelerate and promote the removal of toxic compounds from the environment [22]. Cecchin et al [23] use the term nanobioremediation for processes where NPs and microorganisms or plants are used to remove contaminants. Moreover, El-Ramady et al [24] named these types of practices according to the nature of the organism utilized for the remediation of contaminants.…”
Section: Principles Of Nanobioremediation Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of electrokinetic remediation is most effective in the soils with a high proportion of finer soil particles in the agrillaceous and silty soils (Khalid et al, 2017). The implementation of electrokinetic remediation is performed by the electrodes, which affect the pH value of an agricultural land and immobilize the toxic heavy metal compounds (Koul and Taak, 2018) by generating the H + and the OHions at the anode and cathode, respectively. The particles containing the toxic heavy metal compounds in the soil gradually move toward the electrodes of an opposite charge in an electric field.…”
Section: Radočaj Et Al: the Remediation Of Agricultural Land Contmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A soil replacement dilutes the contaminating heavy metal compounds, thus improving a soil functionality and fertility. Originally contaminated soil removed from an agricultural land is treated with some of the ex-situ remediation technologies or disposed of at special landfills (Koul and Taak, 2018). Although the implementation of this approach is technologically undemanding, the costs of labor and soil transport make this technology economical only in case of a severely contaminated agricultural land in a smaller area.…”
Section: Physical Remediation Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%