Radiation Research 1975
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-523350-7.50073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Radiosensitization Studies With Mammalian Cells Growing In Vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32 for a fuller discussion). This equation has been shown to describe accurately the survival of Chinese hamster fibroblasts at all stages of the cell cycle (33), and in exponential growth with or without a variety of radiosensitizing and protecting agents (34). It follows from the model that unrepaired DSBs in the same cells are given by…”
Section: Possible Biological Significancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…32 for a fuller discussion). This equation has been shown to describe accurately the survival of Chinese hamster fibroblasts at all stages of the cell cycle (33), and in exponential growth with or without a variety of radiosensitizing and protecting agents (34). It follows from the model that unrepaired DSBs in the same cells are given by…”
Section: Possible Biological Significancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have pointed out the efficiency of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) as an effective radioprotector by its ability to scavenge OH radicals. The protection does not increase at concentrations above 1 M (Chapman et al, 1975). This saturation allows us to define the indirect and direct effects as scavengeable or non-scavengeable, respectively (Ward, 1991).…”
Section: Copyright © 2003 S Karger Ag Baselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention has focused on its ability to sensitize hypoxic cells to the effects of sparsely ionizing radiations, and it is on this basis and in this context that its clinical use is being actively pursued at the present time (Denekamp and Harris, 1975;Sheldon, Foster and Fowler, 1974;Gray et al, 1976;Brown, 1975;Chapman et al, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%