1992
DOI: 10.1021/j100197a059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical shift changes on micellization of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate and oleate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a large extent of upfield chemical shifts in the proton NMR spectra of surfactant systems is not common. Only recently have Kumar and co-workers observed similar upfield chemical shifts in their studies with linear alkyl benzenesulfonate and oleate micellar systems (23,24). Aromatic compounds possessing a phenolic-OH functionality are more hydrophilic compared to other compounds used for the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Such a large extent of upfield chemical shifts in the proton NMR spectra of surfactant systems is not common. Only recently have Kumar and co-workers observed similar upfield chemical shifts in their studies with linear alkyl benzenesulfonate and oleate micellar systems (23,24). Aromatic compounds possessing a phenolic-OH functionality are more hydrophilic compared to other compounds used for the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…This last feature is also observed for free oleate molecules below their critical micelle concentration. 57 In any case, under these conditions, the anti-parallel arrangement of two adjacent SL molecules is a hypothesis to be considered with good probability where the free COO -group would be solvated by water both inside and outside the tubule. Whatever the configuration adopted by adjacent SL molecules, the micellar surface becomes negatively charged with pH.…”
Section: E-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency of different surfactants to form mixed micelles is governed by their attractive (synergistic) or repulsive (antagonistic) interactions and is often explained from the β parameter estimated using Rubingh ' s regular solution theory (6). Extensive studies have been carried out on various mixed surfactant systems like anionic-anionic (7)(8)(9), cationic-cationic (10)(11)(12), anionic-nonionic (13)(14)(15), cationic-nonionic (16,17), cationicanionic (18,19), and nonionic-nonionic (20). Considerable interaction has been reported for ionic-nonionic systems, whereas weak or negligible interaction has been observed for similarly charged surfactants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%