2023
DOI: 10.3390/bios13110980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Trends in Sample Preparation for Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT): A Review

Soo Min Lee,
Hari Kalathil Balakrishnan,
Egan H. Doeven
et al.

Abstract: Nucleic acid amplification testing facilitates the detection of disease through specific genomic sequences and is attractive for point-of-need testing (PONT); in particular, the early detection of microorganisms can alert early response systems to protect the public and ecosystems from widespread outbreaks of biological threats, including infectious diseases. Prior to nucleic acid amplification and detection, extensive sample preparation techniques are required to free nucleic acids and extract them from the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, amplicons were detected by gel electrophoresis following LAMP but not PCR, indicating the paper inhibited both amplification and detection during qPCR but only interfered with the fluorescence detection in qLAMP. Combined with an expected loss in sensitivity at higher salt levels because of an increase in dissociation constant (K d ) of SYBR green for DNA 1 , 29 , fluorescence detection was deemed unsuitable for the targeted extraction following PASAP. cLAMP has become a popular choice for in-field testing for non-quantitative detection 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, amplicons were detected by gel electrophoresis following LAMP but not PCR, indicating the paper inhibited both amplification and detection during qPCR but only interfered with the fluorescence detection in qLAMP. Combined with an expected loss in sensitivity at higher salt levels because of an increase in dissociation constant (K d ) of SYBR green for DNA 1 , 29 , fluorescence detection was deemed unsuitable for the targeted extraction following PASAP. cLAMP has become a popular choice for in-field testing for non-quantitative detection 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented above suggest that the eluting strength of 70% ethanol may be too high for it to be a suitable washing reagent. Washing reagents during DNA extraction on anionic stationary phases have included water-miscible solvents like isopropanol to remove the salt 1 . Non-polar solvents were used in the two-phase wash to limit the carryover of aqueous inhibitors but were typically added between the wash step and the final elution 28 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation