“…Alloying Pt with 3d transition metals (where M is Co, Fe, Cu, etc.) has been recognized as a feasible strategy to simultaneously reduce the Pt loading and promote the activity and durability through unique geometric and electronic configurations. − The existent ligand effect and strain effect incur the position variation of the metal d-band center relative to the Fermi level from the perspectives of short-range charge transfer and long-range geometric effects. , Compared with disordered Pt-based alloys, Pt intermetallic compounds with ordered anisotropy and strong Pt–M bonding are advantageous in further vanquishing transition metal dissolution, agglomeration, and detachment issues during electrocatalysis through a strong 3d–5d orbital coupling effect. − Thus far, binary Pt–M intermetallics, such as tetragonally L1 0 -ordered PtCo and PtFe, cubically L1 2 -ordered Pt 3 Co, and rhombohedral L1 1 -ordered PtCu, have been extensively investigated in the past decades. More recently, structurally ordered intermetallic catalysts based on ternary Pt–M–M′ (M and M′ represent two different transition metals) systems have also been proposed to further optimize the strain, ligand environment, and electronic state through the multielemental coupling, which is expected to yield better activity and durability than binary systems. − Despite being promising, the achievable activity/durability of reported ternary Pt–M–M′ catalysts is still far behind the ideal, largely because of the inevitable dissolution of transition metals, particularly when they are atomically exposed to an acidic environment.…”