1980
DOI: 10.1002/chin.198040011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: A DIFFUSIONLESS PHASE TRANSFORMATION OF ALUMINUM‐MAGNESIUM (AL3MG2) INTERMETALLIC COMPOUND

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DSC curve under normal pressure only exhibits an endothermic peak ascribed to the diffusionless transformation, which is highlighted in Fig. 2b [20]. No endothermic peak of GP zones dissolution similar to those in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DSC curve under normal pressure only exhibits an endothermic peak ascribed to the diffusionless transformation, which is highlighted in Fig. 2b [20]. No endothermic peak of GP zones dissolution similar to those in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The DSC curve under normal pressure presents two different endothermic peaks, the one in the range 77-120°C is due to the dissolution of GP zones formed during natural ageing at room temperature; the other in the range 240-270°C is due to the diffusionless transformation that is shown in Fig. 1b [20]. The DSC curves of Al-32Mg alloy solidified under high pressures all present three thermal peaks, one is an endothermic peak due to the dissolution of GP zones and the other two are exothermic peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another work on the AleMg system [20], a diffusionless phase transformation to a lower-symmetry phase (with its details undetermined) was reported to occur within the homogeneity range of the b-Al 3 Mg 2 phase. The transition temperature was found to be strongly concentration dependent, occurring at about 510 K for 38.2 at.% Mg and decreasing to 270 K for 39.7% Mg.…”
Section: Structural Details and Sample Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, the linear thermal expansion coefficients of the involved phases are quite different, being approximately 32 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 K Ϫ1 at 420°C [21] or 38 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 K Ϫ1 at 500°C [18] for alloys close to Al 8 Mg 5 and 17.4 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 K Ϫ1 in the range from 100°C to 500°C [22] for Al 2 Cu. Therefore, the application of a mixture rule gives the increase in the LTEC with concentration in heterogeneous Al-Mg alloys and the opposite trend in the case of Al-Cu alloys.…”
Section: Contraction Of Aluminum Alloys At Subsolidus Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%