1990
DOI: 10.1002/chin.199008195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Benzo‐ and Pyrido‐1,4‐oxazepin‐5‐ones and ‐thiones: Synthesis and Structure‐Activity Relationships of a New Series of H1 Antihistamines.

Abstract: A series of benzo‐ or pyrido‐1,4‐oxazepinones and the corresponding ‐thiones such as the compounds (VIII) and (XI) is prepared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rocastine series, the greater potency of the pyridyl compounds relative to their phenyl analogues suggests that the pyridyl compounds relative to their phenyl analogues suggests that the pyridyl ring of 1 may fit the same receptor site as the pyridine ring in 31, while the increase in potency on introduction of a chloro substituent at the 7-position of 1 (analogue 2) parallels the SAR associated with the chlorphenyl group of 31, sug- gesting a similar receptor fit for the pyridine ring of 1 and the chlorophenyl group of 31. Super imposition of the binding conformation of the active R isomer of the chlorinated analogue (2) of rocastine over the S isomer of chlorpheniramine (31) in Figure 8 supports the latter interpretation and shows that the chloro substituent of each is, in fact, simlarly positioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In the rocastine series, the greater potency of the pyridyl compounds relative to their phenyl analogues suggests that the pyridyl compounds relative to their phenyl analogues suggests that the pyridyl ring of 1 may fit the same receptor site as the pyridine ring in 31, while the increase in potency on introduction of a chloro substituent at the 7-position of 1 (analogue 2) parallels the SAR associated with the chlorphenyl group of 31, sug- gesting a similar receptor fit for the pyridine ring of 1 and the chlorophenyl group of 31. Super imposition of the binding conformation of the active R isomer of the chlorinated analogue (2) of rocastine over the S isomer of chlorpheniramine (31) in Figure 8 supports the latter interpretation and shows that the chloro substituent of each is, in fact, simlarly positioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%