1986
DOI: 10.1002/chin.198640067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Mechanism for the Opsin Shift of Retinal′s Absorption in Bacteriorhodopsin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous FTIR (Rothschild & Marrero, 1982;Bagley et al, 1982), laser Raman (Smith et al, 1987;Hildebrandt & Stockburger, 1984), and NMR studies (Harbison et al, 1983(Harbison et al, , 1985a, together with chemical analogue experiments (Nakanishi et al, 1980;Lugtenburg et al, 1986;Spudich et al, 1986) and theoretical calculations (Honig et al, 1976), have contributed to our present understanding of the electronic properties of the chromophore in bR. It appears that several mechanisms contribute to the opsin shift, the three most important being the configuration of the 6-7 (6-s) single bond, which influences the extension of the 7r-electron system into the the p-ionone ring, the strength of the hydrogen bond at the Schiff base, and electrostatic interactions with other nearby protein charges [see, e.g., Lugtenburg et al (1986) and references cited therein].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous FTIR (Rothschild & Marrero, 1982;Bagley et al, 1982), laser Raman (Smith et al, 1987;Hildebrandt & Stockburger, 1984), and NMR studies (Harbison et al, 1983(Harbison et al, , 1985a, together with chemical analogue experiments (Nakanishi et al, 1980;Lugtenburg et al, 1986;Spudich et al, 1986) and theoretical calculations (Honig et al, 1976), have contributed to our present understanding of the electronic properties of the chromophore in bR. It appears that several mechanisms contribute to the opsin shift, the three most important being the configuration of the 6-7 (6-s) single bond, which influences the extension of the 7r-electron system into the the p-ionone ring, the strength of the hydrogen bond at the Schiff base, and electrostatic interactions with other nearby protein charges [see, e.g., Lugtenburg et al (1986) and references cited therein].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It appears that several mechanisms contribute to the opsin shift, the three most important being the configuration of the 6-7 (6-s) single bond, which influences the extension of the 7r-electron system into the the p-ionone ring, the strength of the hydrogen bond at the Schiff base, and electrostatic interactions with other nearby protein charges [see, e.g., Lugtenburg et al (1986) and references cited therein]. The importance of the hydrogen bonding of the Schiff base may also be appreciated by comparing the pK, > 12 of the Schiff base in bR (Ehrenberg et al, 1980;Doukas et al, 1981;Druckmann et al, 1982) with the pKa N 7 typically observed for protonated Schiff base model compounds (Favrot et al, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dark-adapted bR comprising a mixture of bR,,, and bR568 (Scherrer et al, 1989); bR,,,, 1 3 4 s component of dark-adapted bR; bR568, light-adapted bR; bR,,, blue membrane obtained by acidification or deionization of bR,,; bR!65, acid purple membrane obtained by acidification of blue membrane with HCI; CP, cross-polarization;A fraction of total intensity in the difference spectrum; FWHM, full width at half-maximum; MAS, magic angle spinning; PSB, protonated Schiff base; PM, purple membrane; ppm, parts per million; TMS, tetramethylsilane; A, , , , wavelength of maximum visible absorption; wr, magic angle spinning speed; u, chemical shift. There have been numerous investigations of the opsin shift (Honig et al, 1976;Nakanishi et al, 1980;Bagley et al, 1982;Rothschild & Marrero, 1982;Harbison et al, 1983Harbison et al, , 1985aHildebrandt & Stockburger, 1984;Lugtenburg et al, 1986;Spudich et al, 1986;Smith et al, 1987), and currently, the effect is thought to be due to a combination of various chromophore-protein interactions (Muradin-Szweykowska et al, 1984;Lugtenburg et al, 1986). Important contributions include a weak hydrogen bond between the protonated Schiff base and its counterion (Oseroff & Callender, 1974;Blatz & Mohler, 1975;Harbison et al, 1983;de Groot et al, 1989) and isomerization of the C6-C7 bond from the 6-s-cis structure dominating in solution to the 6-s-trans bR geometry illustrated in Figure 1 (Harbison et al,1 98 5a,b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the substitution at the retinal positions 4 and 18 (methyl group at position 5 ) or the introduction of the a-configuration of the ring double bond led to strong A,,, shifts of the absorption maxima [8, 32 -341. These absorption changes, however, can be explained by a direct influence of the substitutions on the interactions between the chromophore and a proposed ion pair located in the ring region (for a proposed arrangement of the ion pair formed by two amino acid residues see [12,321). For the shifts of the absorption maximum of 13-methoxy BR, a disturbed interaction with the protein around the region of the Schiff base group must be assumed, as supported by the results obtained with 13-ethyl retinal BR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%