2002
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200208103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Similarities and Differences Between (C60)22‐ and (C59N)2 Conformers.

Abstract: ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(C 60 – ) 2 and (C 59 N) 2 have the same electronic number and similar structures (Figures 1a, 1b). According to the previous theoretical predictions, [ 36 ] the most stable conformer for (C 60 – ) 2 dimer is an anti‐conformer with C 2h symmetry, which has been confirmed in the crystallographic structures [ 9 ] as shown in Figure 1b, but the length of the inter‐ cage C—C bond (1.597 Å) slightly deviates from the predicted one (1.618 Å). [ 36 ] Notably, the length of the inter‐cage C—C bond (1.597 Å) is longer than that of a normal C(sp 3 )‐C(sp 3 ) single bond, and the difference of the inter‐cage C—C bond lengths between (C 59 N) 2 and (C 60 – ) 2 may explain why (C 60 – ) 2 depolymerizes above 220 K, [ 9 ] while (C 59 N) 2 depolymerizes above 500 K. [ 36 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(C 60 – ) 2 and (C 59 N) 2 have the same electronic number and similar structures (Figures 1a, 1b). According to the previous theoretical predictions, [ 36 ] the most stable conformer for (C 60 – ) 2 dimer is an anti‐conformer with C 2h symmetry, which has been confirmed in the crystallographic structures [ 9 ] as shown in Figure 1b, but the length of the inter‐ cage C—C bond (1.597 Å) slightly deviates from the predicted one (1.618 Å). [ 36 ] Notably, the length of the inter‐cage C—C bond (1.597 Å) is longer than that of a normal C(sp 3 )‐C(sp 3 ) single bond, and the difference of the inter‐cage C—C bond lengths between (C 59 N) 2 and (C 60 – ) 2 may explain why (C 60 – ) 2 depolymerizes above 220 K, [ 9 ] while (C 59 N) 2 depolymerizes above 500 K. [ 36 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As shown in Table 2, our optimized structures by a B3LYP‐ D3BJ method are more consistent with the single crystal structures than that by a commonly used B3LYP method, [ 36 ] suggesting that the B3LYP‐D3BJ function is more suitable for the systems of fullerene dimers. With regard to distances, R C‐C of (C 59 N) 2 is shorter than that of (C 60 ) 2 , [P(O)(OMe) 2 C 60 ] 2 and the three (C 60 – ) 2 dimers, while the D inter‐cage of (C 60 ) 2 is the shortest, probably due to two inter‐cage C—C single bonds in (C 60 ) 2 (whereas only one inter‐cage C—C single bond in the other dimers).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations