2013
DOI: 10.1002/chin.201401174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Synthesis and in vitro Antifungal Activities of New 2‐Aryl‐6,7‐methylenedioxy‐3,4‐dihydroisoquinolin‐2‐ium Bromides.

Abstract: Synthesis and in vitro Antifungal Activities of New 2-Aryl-6,7-methylenedioxy--3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium Bromides. -A simple method is elaborated for the preparation of novel dihydroisoquinolinium bromides (IV) (26 examples). Almost all of these compounds show higher activities against all the fungi tested than their natural model compounds sanguinarine and chelerythrine. In general o-halogenated aryl derivatives such as (IVe) show the highest activities. -(YANG, X.; YAO, Y.; QIN, Y.; HOU, Z.; YANG, R.; MIA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For nitro-substituted compounds, the presence of 2′-NO 2 (5-31) caused reduction of the activities against all three fungi, and the presence of 3′-NO 2 (5-30) could lead to an increase of the activities against A. alternate and V. mali, similar to that observed for 2-aryl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides 8 and 2-aryl-6,7-methylenedioxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides. 9 However, 4′-NO 2 in three series of the compounds has different effects on the activity. For 5-29, the introduction of 4′-NO 2 led to a decrease of the activities against all three fungi, whereas for 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides and 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-6,7-methylenedioxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides, the presence of 4′-NO 2 could increase the activities against both A. alternate and V. mali.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For nitro-substituted compounds, the presence of 2′-NO 2 (5-31) caused reduction of the activities against all three fungi, and the presence of 3′-NO 2 (5-30) could lead to an increase of the activities against A. alternate and V. mali, similar to that observed for 2-aryl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides 8 and 2-aryl-6,7-methylenedioxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides. 9 However, 4′-NO 2 in three series of the compounds has different effects on the activity. For 5-29, the introduction of 4′-NO 2 led to a decrease of the activities against all three fungi, whereas for 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides and 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-6,7-methylenedioxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromides, the presence of 4′-NO 2 could increase the activities against both A. alternate and V. mali.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 4.60 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-3), 3.55 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4); 13 4.65 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz,H-3), 3.54 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4); 13 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-6-chloro-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromide (5)(6)(7)(8). Yield: 76%; yellow powder; mp 211.9−212.4 °C; IR, υ max (KBr) cm −1 : 1621 (s, CN); UV λ max (lg ε) (MeOH) 331 (4.00) nm; 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ: 9.58 (1H, s, H-1), 8.05 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-8), 7.88 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′,6′), 7.80 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′,5′), 7.71 (1H, s, H-5), 7.69 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-7), 4.65 (2H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, H-3), 3.54 (2H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, H-4); 13 6-Chloro-2-(3-iodophenyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-ium bromide (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Yield: 67%; yellow powder; mp 177.1−177.5 °C; IR, υ max (KBr) cm −1 : 1620 (s, CN); UV λ max (lg ε) (MeOH) 319 (4.07) nm; 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ: 9.57 (1H, s, H-1), 8.28 (1H, s, H-2′), 8.05 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.88 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-8), 7.71 (1H, s, H-5), 7.69 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-7), 7.47 (1H, t, J = 8.1 Hz), 4.63 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-3), 3.53 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4); 13 4.58 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-3), 3.54 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4); 13 7.90 (1H, dd, J = 8.5,2.0 Hz, H-5′), 7.86 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6′), 7.75 (1H, s, H-5), 7.72 (1H, dd, J = 8.2,1.9 Hz, H-7), 4.52 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-3), 3.61 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4); 13 6-Chloro-2-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2ium bromide (5-25).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations