The
synthesis of five-coordinate amido hydride PSiP pincer complexes
of both RhIII and IrIII was pursued. The preparation
of such complexes by a salt metathesis route was initially targeted
to assess the synthetic viability of such species. Isolable anilido
hydride complexes of both Rh and Ir proved accessible, and rare examples
of thermally robust Ir alkylamido hydride complexes were found to
be viable synthetic targets. The preparation of amido hydride species
by N–H oxidative addition was also pursued. Toward this end,
the generation of coordinatively unsaturated (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)MI (M = Rh, Ir) species was
investigated. Dehydrohalogenation of (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)RhH(Cl) (1) under N2 afforded the isolable complex [(
i
Pr-PSiPInd)Rh]2(μ-N2) (8a). While the N2 ligand could be displaced to afford (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)RhL (L = PMe3, DMAP, H2NPh), such RhI species proved unreactive
toward N–H oxidative addition of aniline. Dehydrohalogenation
of (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)IrH(Cl) (2) in benzene solution resulted in activation of the solvent
to afford (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)IrH(Ph)
(11), which undergoes facile arene exchange with benzene-d
6. In cyclohexane solution, treatment with aniline
afforded a mixture of N–H and aniline sp
2-C–H bond oxidative addition products, with the latter
species being favored. Although the observation of arene exchange
involving (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)IrH(Ph)
suggests that C–H bond oxidative addition is reversible, attempts
to drive the reactivity with aniline in the direction of N–H
bond oxidative addition were unsuccessful. This reactivity differs
significantly from that of previously reported complexes supported
by related PSiP ligation. Most notably, it appears that for (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)Ir, products resulting
from N–H- and C–H-oxidative addition of aniline substrates
do not readily interconvert, although both are postulated to share
a common intermediate of the type (
i
Pr-PSiPInd)Ir(NH2Ph).