1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15360.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemiosmotic energy conversion and the membrane ATPase of Methanolobus tindarius

Abstract: Electron transport phosphorylation has been demonstrated to drive ATP synthesis for the methanogenic archaebacterium Methanolobus tindarius: Protonophores evoked uncoupler effects and lowered the membrane potential Ay. Under the influence of N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide [(cHxN),C] the membrane potential increased while methanol turnover was inhibited. 2-Bromoethanesulfonate, an inhibitor of methanogenesis, had no effect on the membrane potential but, like (CHXN)~C and protonophores, decreased the intracellula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation probably is similar in M. mazei because it has functional Frh, Vht, and Fpo enzymes as well (11). However, methylotrophic species such as M. acetivorans (10,21,28), Methanolobus tindarius (40,41), and Methanococcoides burtonii (42) do not encode functional hydrogenases (22). Hence, these organisms probably rely exclusively on the F 420 H 2 :heterodisulfide oxidoreductase system for energy conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation probably is similar in M. mazei because it has functional Frh, Vht, and Fpo enzymes as well (11). However, methylotrophic species such as M. acetivorans (10,21,28), Methanolobus tindarius (40,41), and Methanococcoides burtonii (42) do not encode functional hydrogenases (22). Hence, these organisms probably rely exclusively on the F 420 H 2 :heterodisulfide oxidoreductase system for energy conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The archaeal A 1 A 0 ATPase 2 shares properties with both, bacterial F 1 F 0 and eucaryal V 1 V 0 ATPases (3,4). It clearly functions as an ATP synthase, which is in accordance with F 1 F 0 but in sharp contrast to V 1 V 0 ATPases; the structure of the proteolipid (one of the subunits of the A 0 domain), which is in the range of 6 -8 kDa in A 1 A 0 and F 1 F 0 ATPases but 16 kDa in V 1 V 0 ATPases, was suggested to be at least one of the reasons for this difference (5)(6)(7)(8). On the other hand, the primary sequences of the subunits A and B of the catalytic A 1 domain are clearly more closely related to vacuolar V 1 V 0 ATPases (9 -12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is generally accepted that the A 1 domain contains at least two large subunits of 62-80 kDa (subunit A) and 49 -55 kDa (subunit B) and the A 0 domain contains a least a 7-kDa subunit, the so-called proteolipid. Minor subunits co-purified with the enzyme (5,8,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), but it has not been established whether these are genuine constituents of the ATPase. Furthermore, little is known about the genetic organization of the A 1 A 0 ATPases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intracellular ATP content was determined by the luciferase assay (41). Samples (0.5 ml) of the cell suspension were placed in 2.0 ml of boiling glycine (pH 7.2) buffer to inactivate enzymatic activity, and then 0.15 ml of each sample was mixed with 50 RI of luciferaseluciferin agent (Sigma).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%