2006
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200600155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemisorptive Removal of Carbon Dioxide from Process Streams Using a Reactive Bubble Column with Simultaneous Production of Usable Materials

Abstract: In the context of attempts to improve the protection of the environment, a novel process where the carbon dioxide reacts rapidly with almost 100 % conversion under mild conditions, is proposed. The chemisorptive process takes place in a slurry bubble column which operates with countercurrent flow, utilizing special solutions of primary long chain amines in a nonaqueous media. The product obtained is insoluble and separated by filtration. Because of its molecular structure, this product possesses tenside proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operating conditions and measured data obtained in this work. [24,[34][35][36][37]. Other evaluated output data, such as removal efficiency, absorption rate, overall mass transfer coefficient, and scrubbing factor, are also listed in Tab.…”
Section: Determination Of Liquid Flow Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating conditions and measured data obtained in this work. [24,[34][35][36][37]. Other evaluated output data, such as removal efficiency, absorption rate, overall mass transfer coefficient, and scrubbing factor, are also listed in Tab.…”
Section: Determination Of Liquid Flow Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the bubble column, the absorption factor is 5 to 10 times that of the packed column of high-efficiency structured packing material, which indicates that under the same conditions, in order to obtain the same absorption factor, the volume of the packed column of high-efficiency structured packing material should be 5 to 10 times that of the bubble column; and while the volume of a conventional packed column, needs to be 130 times that of the bubble column to have the same absorption factor as the bubble column [21]. The above results show that the bubble column shows superior performance and many scholars use the bubble column as the absorber and object of study to this end [5,[22][23][24]. To summarize, using aqueous ammonia as the absorbent requires high load and low energy for regeneration.…”
Section: Absorption Model and Solution Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above results show that the bubble column shows superior performance and many scholars use the bubble column as the absorber and object of study to this end [5,[22][23][24]. To summarize, using aqueous ammonia as the absorbent requires high load and low energy for regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, CO2 absorption technologies have become more diversified, among which chemical absorption effect is the best (Bai and Yeh, 1997;Yeh et al, 1999;Chen et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2003;Petrov, et al, 2006). Internationally, thousands of factors use amines as absorbent to absorb CO2 (Versteeg et al, 1996;Xiao et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%