1976
DOI: 10.1139/v76-281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemistry of proximal π-bond systems. Part IV. The structure of 5,6-dimethylenebicyclo[2,2,1]hept-2-ene molybdenum tricarbonyl

Abstract: Crystals of 5,6-dimethylenebicyclo[2,2,1]hept-2-ene molybdenum tricarbonyl 1 (M = Mo) are monoclinic, a = 7.4451(3) Å, b = 13.5783(7) Å, c = 11.2691(4) Å, β = 92.593(3)°, Z = 4, space group P21/c. The structure was solved by the 'heavy atom' method and was refined by full-matrix least square procedures to a final R = 0.031. The weighted R factor was 0.051. Experimental bond lengths and angles are close to other reported values for bicyclo[2,2,1]hept-2-ene systems except for three major distortions in the trien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note a recent counter example to this where it was not until data with 29 > 40°(X-1 sin 9 > 0.4822 A*1) were included that a recognizable solution appeared, despite, in this case, the input of considerable (correct) molecular information for the calculation of E values.34 All hydrogen atoms were easily located in a penultimate difference Fourier map. Least-squares refinements converged at values for R and ftw on F of 0.040 and 0.048 for a model comprising 17 nonhydrogen atoms with anisotropic thermal parameters, 10 hydrogen atoms with isotropic thermal parameters, and a parameter for secondary extinction-a total of 195 variable parameters. The final value for the error in an observation of unit weight was 1.36 e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note a recent counter example to this where it was not until data with 29 > 40°(X-1 sin 9 > 0.4822 A*1) were included that a recognizable solution appeared, despite, in this case, the input of considerable (correct) molecular information for the calculation of E values.34 All hydrogen atoms were easily located in a penultimate difference Fourier map. Least-squares refinements converged at values for R and ftw on F of 0.040 and 0.048 for a model comprising 17 nonhydrogen atoms with anisotropic thermal parameters, 10 hydrogen atoms with isotropic thermal parameters, and a parameter for secondary extinction-a total of 195 variable parameters. The final value for the error in an observation of unit weight was 1.36 e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%