2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemogenetic Approaches to Explore the Functions of Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess physiological roles of FFA2 in mouse tissues without potential confounding effects of either activation of the related SCFA-receptor FFA3 or non-receptor mediated effects of SCFAs we recently developed a hFFA2-DREADD knock-in transgenic mouse line (29). Here, mouse FFA2 is replaced by hFFA2-DREADD with, in addition, an appended C- terminal anti-HA epitope tag sequence to allow effective identification of cells expressing the receptor construct (20, 28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess physiological roles of FFA2 in mouse tissues without potential confounding effects of either activation of the related SCFA-receptor FFA3 or non-receptor mediated effects of SCFAs we recently developed a hFFA2-DREADD knock-in transgenic mouse line (29). Here, mouse FFA2 is replaced by hFFA2-DREADD with, in addition, an appended C- terminal anti-HA epitope tag sequence to allow effective identification of cells expressing the receptor construct (20, 28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most significantly in the context of phosphorylation bar-coding we were able to show tissue-selective phosphorylation of Thr 306 and Thr 310 . To do so we took advantage of a knockin transgenic mouse line that we have characterized extensively (20,(28)(29). In this line we replaced mouse FFA2 with hFFA2-DREADD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction and binding properties of the two FFAR2 specific antagonist (CATPB and GLPG0974) included in the study have previously been fairly well characterized/documented [10,11,13,35,36]. Although their detailed binding characteristics differ, it has been shown that both antagonists fit into, and bind specifically to the orthosteric site/binding pocket in human FFAR2 and that their respective affinity for the receptor are very similar or even identical [7,13]. Accordingly, both antagonists inhibit the response induced by natural (i.e., short chain fatty acids) as well as synthetic (i.e., small compounds such as Cmp1; [11,37] orthosteric FFAR2 agonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of this receptor family are all membrane proteins that change their basic conformation when agonists (activating ligands) bind to the so called orthosteric binding site exposed on the membrane surface of receptor-expressing cells [4,5]. Free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2 [6,7]) is such a receptor expressed in neutrophils. This receptor recognizes short fatty acids (FFAs) such as acetate and propionate, metabolites produced by gut microorganisms during fermentation of dietary fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the role of regulated phosphorylation of FFA4, the wild type receptor was replaced with a variant in which all the hydroxy-amino acids in the C-terminal tail were replaced by alanines ( phospho-deficient, PD ). In addition, to facilitate detection of the expressed receptor protein, the HA-epitope tag sequence was placed in-frame at the C-terminus, as previously reported for the free fatty acid receptor 2 [ 138 , 139 , 140 ]. Together with the wild type and FFA4 knock-out littermates, a comprehensive understanding of the role of the phosphorylation of FFA4 may be established by studying this line.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%