1987
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-133-5-1249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemolithotrophic and Autotrophic Growth of Thermothrix thiopara and Some Thiobacilli on Thiosulphate and Polythionates, and a Reassessment of the Growth Yields of Thx. thiopara in Chemostat Culture

Abstract: Several thiobacilli and Thermothrix thiopara were grown in chemostat culture with inorganic sulphur compounds as growth-limiting energy substrates for autotrophic growth. Thiobacillus neapolitanus, Thiobacillus thiooxidans and Thiobacillus acidophilus were all able to use thiosulphate, trithionate or tetrathionate as sole energy substrates, as was Thx. thiopara grown at 72 "C. 'True growth yields' (Y,,,) were estimated for the organisms and showed yields of T . neapolitanus to be the same on trithionate and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its growth on the one-carbon organosulfur compounds carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide must also be autotrophic, but the biochemistry of its growth on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol has not been investigated. Its growth yields on autotrophic substrates are comparable to those seen with Paracoccus versutus (Kelly et al 1979;Kelly andWood 1982, 1984;Kraczkiewicz-Dowjat and Kelly 1991) and Paracoccus denitrificans (Jordan et al 1995;Jordan 1996;Kelly and Wood 1996), but our results are the first to show that the autotrophic yield on thiosulfate as the sole energy substrate is of the same order as those for some Paracoccus and Thiobacillus species Mason et al 1987;Kelly 1990). The 10-to 20-fold stimulation by bicarbonate of the poor growth yields on the one-carbon methylotrophic substrates methylamine and methanol was indicative of the absence of a carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanism from this organism, as seen with autotrophic P. versutus (Karagouni and Kelly 1989), and also indicates the importance of carbon dioxide for growth on these substrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its growth on the one-carbon organosulfur compounds carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide must also be autotrophic, but the biochemistry of its growth on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol has not been investigated. Its growth yields on autotrophic substrates are comparable to those seen with Paracoccus versutus (Kelly et al 1979;Kelly andWood 1982, 1984;Kraczkiewicz-Dowjat and Kelly 1991) and Paracoccus denitrificans (Jordan et al 1995;Jordan 1996;Kelly and Wood 1996), but our results are the first to show that the autotrophic yield on thiosulfate as the sole energy substrate is of the same order as those for some Paracoccus and Thiobacillus species Mason et al 1987;Kelly 1990). The 10-to 20-fold stimulation by bicarbonate of the poor growth yields on the one-carbon methylotrophic substrates methylamine and methanol was indicative of the absence of a carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanism from this organism, as seen with autotrophic P. versutus (Karagouni and Kelly 1989), and also indicates the importance of carbon dioxide for growth on these substrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…-1 ] against dilution rate (Fieschko and Humphrey 1984;Mason et al 1987). To determine the growth yield on hydrogen in the presence of a growth-limiting quantity of oxygen, batch cultures (25 ml in sealed 300-ml flasks) were provided with bicarbonate (10 mM) and a gas mixture of 10 parts oxygen and 90 parts hydrogen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is comparable to growth yields observed for other (facultative) autotrophic sulfide/ thiosulfate oxidizing Proteobacteria that range from 2.5 to 16 g DW mol -1 (data not corrected for dissimilated substrate) (Table S1). Also, the sulfide and thiosulfate respiration rates, maximum growth rates and maintenance coefficients are in the range observed for this type of organisms (Mason et al, 1987;Sorokin et al, 2003;Banciu et al, 2004). Table S1 lists growth yields and maximum growth rates for neutrophilic, mesophilic sulfuroxidizing Proteobacteria.…”
Section: Characterization Of Autotrophic Growthmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The facultative autotroph T. acidophilus is capable of heterotrophic growth on glucose and various other simple organic compounds (7,22). Autotrophic growth can be supported by a variety of inorganic sulfur compounds (7,15,20) and formate (J. T. Pronk, P. de Bruijn, J. P. van Dijken, P. Bos, and J. G. Kuenen, Arch. Microbiol., in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%