1991
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90272-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoreception in Hydra vulgaris (attenuata): initial characterization of two distinct binding sites for l-glutamic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that these receptors are functionally activated by their specific ligands; the ability of GSH to potentiate [ 3 H]MK-801 binding is consistent with data obtained in rat (Ogita et al, 1995) and Hydra (Bellis et al, 1991) membrane preparations.…”
Section: Excitatory Transmitters and Receptors: Glutamatesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings indicate that these receptors are functionally activated by their specific ligands; the ability of GSH to potentiate [ 3 H]MK-801 binding is consistent with data obtained in rat (Ogita et al, 1995) and Hydra (Bellis et al, 1991) membrane preparations.…”
Section: Excitatory Transmitters and Receptors: Glutamatesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Binding studies show that glutamate binds to crude membrane fractions of Hydra (Bellis et al, 1991 (Grosvenor et al, 1992).…”
Section: Excitatory Transmitters and Receptors: Glutamatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, calcium and potassium channels were characterised in jellyfish with functional features similar to those measured in vertebrate counterparts Jeziorski et al (1999), Grigoriev et al (1999), while GABAreceptors were pharmacologically identified Pierobon et al (2001). Neurotransmitters like glycine Pierobon et al (2001), nitric oxide Colasanti et al (1997), endocannabinoid De Petrocellis et al (1999 and glutamate Bellis et al (1991) are likely playing a physiological role in the feeding response.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast to glutamate (Bellis et al, 1991), these ligands do not modify times of mouth opening, suggesting that their effect is exerted on the neuromuscular circuitry underlying the feeding behaviour, rather than on the GSH receptor itself (reviewed in Pierobon, 2012). Therefore, neurotransmitter modulation of the feeding behaviour seems to be attained by multiple complex chemical and/or cellular pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%