2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemosensory perception and food preferences in colorectal cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract: Background and aim: Cancer is one of the major public health problems, with colorectal cancer being one of the most occurring types of cancer. During treatment, patients may experience changes in their dietary intake due to side-effects of treatment, like changes in chemosensory perception, i.e. smell and taste function. This study investigated alterations in chemosensory perception and food preferences in colorectal cancer patients during and after adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Objective olfactory and gusta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of studies on alterations in taste, smell and flavour perception have evaluated these variations through self-reported changes (Sarhill et al, 2003;Rehwaldt et al, 2009;Zabernigg et al, 2010;Sánchez and Rihuete, 2016;IJpma, Timmermans et al, 2017;Amézaga et al, 2018;Aysegul et al, 2019), or by combining these subjective measures with more objective measures of taste and smell thresholds, either by means of the use of electrogustometry (measurement of taste threshold by application of controlled electrical current to the tongue), taste solutions, taste strips, or the use of smelling sticks (see Sánchez-Lara et al, 2010;Boltong et al, 2014;Turcott et al, 2016;IJpma et al, 2016;Ijpma et al, 2017;Vries et al, 2018Vries et al, , 2019. Far from obtaining similar results, several studies that have combined both subjective and "objective" methods have highlighted some degree of inconsistency between the various measures (Soter et al, 2008;Landis et al, 2009, Ijpma et al 2017Vries et al, 2018, Postma et al, 2020. A possible explanation for the apparent conflict between the outomes from different types of measure could perhaps be related to the fact that people often do not distinguish between taste and flavor (Spence, Smith, & Auvray, 2015;Spence, 2017;Nolden et al, 2019).…”
Section: Different Measures Different Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies on alterations in taste, smell and flavour perception have evaluated these variations through self-reported changes (Sarhill et al, 2003;Rehwaldt et al, 2009;Zabernigg et al, 2010;Sánchez and Rihuete, 2016;IJpma, Timmermans et al, 2017;Amézaga et al, 2018;Aysegul et al, 2019), or by combining these subjective measures with more objective measures of taste and smell thresholds, either by means of the use of electrogustometry (measurement of taste threshold by application of controlled electrical current to the tongue), taste solutions, taste strips, or the use of smelling sticks (see Sánchez-Lara et al, 2010;Boltong et al, 2014;Turcott et al, 2016;IJpma et al, 2016;Ijpma et al, 2017;Vries et al, 2018Vries et al, , 2019. Far from obtaining similar results, several studies that have combined both subjective and "objective" methods have highlighted some degree of inconsistency between the various measures (Soter et al, 2008;Landis et al, 2009, Ijpma et al 2017Vries et al, 2018, Postma et al, 2020. A possible explanation for the apparent conflict between the outomes from different types of measure could perhaps be related to the fact that people often do not distinguish between taste and flavor (Spence, Smith, & Auvray, 2015;Spence, 2017;Nolden et al, 2019).…”
Section: Different Measures Different Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma análise sobre a percepção quimiossensorial gustativa através dos estudos de Postma et al, 2020, apontaram não haver diferenças estatísticas nos testes objetivos com tiras de sabor significativas na função gustativa entre pacientes submetidos a quimioterapia e o grupo de comparação aos quais não receberam essas tiras. Porém, a percepção subjetiva do paladar foi considerada ruim pelos pacientes durante a execução do tratamento quimioterápico do que por aqueles que não se submeteram a tal processo (Postma et al, 2020). Em um estudo realizado por Amézaga et al, 2018, a xerostomia é o sintoma mais frequente relatado pelos pacientes submetidos pela quimioterapia e está fortemente associada ao gosto metálico na boca e perda de sabor ou hipogeusia (Amézaga et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Cancer chemotherapy alters the ability to detect flavors, odors, and aromas and affects the eating behavior of patients (Postma et al, 2020). For example, hyposmic patients tend to add condiments to their dishes to make them taste good (Fontas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%