2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000152629.20996.9e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with performance status 2

Abstract: There is potential with cytotoxic treatment to improve the palliative options for PS 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Further trials designed specifically for PS 2 patients that include measurement of symptoms, quality of life, and survival and toxicity are required to define the most active but least toxic regimens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the monthly chest radiographs would trigger a CT scan before the protocol timelines, and overall survival was the primary trial endpoint. Also, we included patients of performance status 2, for whom, on the basis of evidence reported in 2005, 15 chemotherapy could improve survival, and a phase 2 study 16 has shown that doublet chemotherapy has a better survival than single agent chemotherapy. However, when TOPICAL was designed, provision of chemotherapy to such patients was not routine practice because many studies with second and third generation chemotherapy had not shown survival benefit, and many of these patients had serious adverse events 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the monthly chest radiographs would trigger a CT scan before the protocol timelines, and overall survival was the primary trial endpoint. Also, we included patients of performance status 2, for whom, on the basis of evidence reported in 2005, 15 chemotherapy could improve survival, and a phase 2 study 16 has shown that doublet chemotherapy has a better survival than single agent chemotherapy. However, when TOPICAL was designed, provision of chemotherapy to such patients was not routine practice because many studies with second and third generation chemotherapy had not shown survival benefit, and many of these patients had serious adverse events 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS 2 patients constitute at least 35–40% of newly diagnosed patients with advanced NSCLC and have a markedly shorter survival compared to good PS patients. (4) They experience enhanced adverse effects with systemic therapies and as a consequence have to a great extent been excluded from clinical trials. Available information on treatment outcomes in this population are confined to a limited number of prospective trials and retrospective subset analyses from several phase III trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available information on treatment outcomes in this population are confined to a limited number of prospective trials and retrospective subset analyses from several phase III trials. (47)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chemotherapy is a standard treatment for NSCLC with response rates of 30% to 40%, NSCLC patients eventually develop resistance to chemotherapy agents resulting in a median survival of only 8 to 10 months [2]. Recently substantial development in molecular targeted therapy is necessary approach in addition to chemotherapy to treat NSCLC because molecular targeted therapy drugs can interfere with and block specific molecular pathways that regulate critical cancer cell growth, survival and progression, such as EGFR signaling pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%