2020
DOI: 10.1172/jci138577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy-induced S100A10 recruits KDM6A to facilitate OCT4-mediated breast cancer stemness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that histone demethylase can activate SOX2 expression through histone demethylation. 16 SOX2 is considered to be an oncogene in LCA. 17,18 RT-qPCR found that SOX2 was highly expressed in LCA ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Kdm5b Promoted Sox2 Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that histone demethylase can activate SOX2 expression through histone demethylation. 16 SOX2 is considered to be an oncogene in LCA. 17,18 RT-qPCR found that SOX2 was highly expressed in LCA ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Kdm5b Promoted Sox2 Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical CSC model proposes that tumor heterogeneity arises from CSCs that transit through different states (epithelial and mesenchymal) of stemness and differentiation (CPCs and CDCs) by unidirectional conversion from CSCs to non-CSCs ( Singh et al, 2015 ). This model, where CSCs would be at the apex of the process, might better account for heterogeneity and hierarchy of cells in the same tumor, but it does not account for recent reports showing that non-CSCs might revert to CSCs ( Chaffer et al, 2011 ; Gupta et al, 2011 ; Kim et al, 2013 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Lu et al, 2020 ). The plastic CSC model proposes that bidirectional conversions are possible between CSCs and non-CSCs, suggesting that during the tumor process, non-CSCs might be induced into CSCs, thus creating new tumor populations ( Chaffer et al, 2011 ; Kim et al, 2013 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Lu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Cell Heterogeneity Hierarchy and Plasticity In Cancermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The plasticity of non-CSCs reverting to a CSC state might be made possible by the genetic instability caused by the absence of genomic homeostasis in the i-CSC/CSC 0 and handed down throughout all its progeny, including CDCs. This instability would allow non-CSCs to be de novo reactivated (neo-re-programmed) in their pluripotency gene regulatory network (OCT4, SOX2, NANONG, KLF4, MYC) by endogenous, niche and/or microenvironmental signals, probably in a different way from the original i-CSC/CSC 0 , thus generating new tumor cell populations ( Iliopulos et al, 2011 ; Kim et al, 2013 ; Cabrera et al, 2015 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Yang et al, 2018 ; Lu et al, 2020 ). Depending on its genetic, epigenetic and microenvironment conditions, a tumor cell could thus realize a defined genic program (“inductive gene chain”) that confers specific phenotypic and physio-pathological features, responsible for a peculiar cell heterogeneity and hierarchy.…”
Section: Cell Heterogeneity Hierarchy and Plasticity In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c-Myc is important for regulating proliferation and the survival of glioma cancer stem cell [ 23 ]. Oct4 is responsible for breast CSC specification and regulated Nanog, Sox2 and Klf4 gene [ 24 ]. Sox2 drives cancer stemness and fuels tumor initiation [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%