Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities: An Imaging Primer

Patil, Nikhil S.; Larocque, Natasha; Pol, Christian B. van der; Torres, Carlos; Raptis, Demetrios A.; Patlas, Michael N.

doi:10.1177/08465371221120263

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 76 publications

(134 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[8] Patil et al also showed that ChatGPT-4 answered significantly more accurately than Bard in the radiology examination (87.1% vs 70.4%; P < .001). [9] In a study using a question bank of the American College of Emergency Medicine, ChatGPT-4 showed a superior performance rate than ChatGPT-3.5 (82.1% vs 61.4%), which was almost similar to the human level. [5] These performance rates of ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 are similar to those reported in our study (75.6% and 56.9%, respectively).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank

Lee,

Hong,

Kim

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Large language models (LLMs) have been deployed in diverse fields, and the potential for their application in medicine has been explored through numerous studies. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Emergency Medicine Board Examination question bank in the Korean language. Of the 2353 questions in the question bank, 150 questions were randomly selected, and 27 containing figures were excluded. Questions that required abilities such as analysis, creative thinking, evaluation, and synthesis were classified as higher-order questions, and those that required only recall, memory, and factual information in response were classified as lower-order questions. The answers and explanations obtained by inputting the 123 questions into the LLMs were analyzed and compared. ChatGPT-4 (75.6%) and Bing Chat (70.7%) showed higher correct response rates than ChatGPT-3.5 (56.9%) and Bard (51.2%). ChatGPT-4 showed the highest correct response rate for the higher-order questions at 76.5%, and Bard and Bing Chat showed the highest rate for the lower-order questions at 71.4%. The appropriateness of the explanation for the answer was significantly higher for ChatGPT-4 and Bing Chat than for ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard (75.6%, 68.3%, 52.8%, and 50.4%, respectively). ChatGPT-4 and Bing Chat outperformed ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard in answering a random selection of Emergency Medicine Board Examination questions in the Korean language.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank

Lee,

Hong,

Kim

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar to past studies, our analysis also found that ChatGPT outperformed Bard, but responded slower. [13][14][15][16] Although slower, the difference between chatbots may not be significant during everyday use. An important deficiency in both AI chatbots' responses is that they did not communicate the probability of various adverse events, and it is uncertain how well they would do so if asked explicitly.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ability of artificial intelligence chatbots ChatGPT and Google Bard to accurately convey pre-operative information for patients undergoing ophthalmological surgeries

Patil,

Huang,

Mihalache

et al. 2024

Retina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: To determine whether the two popular artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, ChatGPT and Bard, provide high-quality information concerning procedure description, risks, benefits, and alternatives of various ophthalmological surgeries. Methods: ChatGPT and Bard were prompted with questions pertaining to the description, potential risks, benefits, alternatives, and implications of not proceeding with various surgeries in different subspecialties of ophthalmology. Six common ophthalmic procedures were included in our analysis. Two comprehensive ophthalmologists and one sub-specialist graded each response independently using a five-point Likert scale. Results: Likert grading for accuracy was significantly higher for ChatGPT in comparison to Bard (4.5±0.6 vs 3.8±0.8, p<0.0001). Generally, ChatGPT performed better than Bard even when questions were stratified by type of ophthalmological surgery. There was no significant difference between ChatGPT and Bard for response length (2104.7±271.4 characters vs 2441.0±633.9 characters, p=0.12). ChatGPT responded significantly slower than Bard (46.0±3.0 seconds vs 6.6±1.2 seconds, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Both ChatGPT and Bard may offer accessible and high-quality information relevant to the informed consent process for various ophthalmic procedures. Nonetheless, both AI chatbots overlooked probability of adverse events, hence limiting their potential and introducing patients to information that may be difficult to interpret.

show abstract

“…Oncologic emergencies can result from local effects of the primary tumour, its metastases, paraneoplastic syndromes, or reaction to the chemotherapeutic agents. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Many oncological emergencies are signs of advanced, stage IV disease, but occasionally patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a previously unknown primary tumour responsible for acute clinical symptoms. Imaging plays a crucial role in both the initial diagnosis and therapeutic decision process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abdominal Emergencies in Cancer Patients

Scaglione

Masala

Tamburrini³

et al. 2023

Can Assoc Radiol J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abdominal emergencies in cancer patients encompass a wide spectrum of oncologic conditions caused directly by malignancies, paraneoplastic syndromes, reactions to the chemotherapy or often represent the first clinical manifestation of an unknown malignancy. Not rarely, clinical symptoms are the tip of an iceberg. In this scenario, the radiologist is asked to exclude the cause responsible for the patient’s symptoms, to suggest the best way to manage and to rule out the underlying malignancy. In this article, we discuss some of the most common abdominal oncological emergencies that may be encountered in an emergency department.

show abstract

Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities: An Imaging Primer

Cited by 18 publications

References 76 publications

Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank

Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank

The ability of artificial intelligence chatbots ChatGPT and Google Bard to accurately convey pre-operative information for patients undergoing ophthalmological surgeries

Abdominal Emergencies in Cancer Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About