2008
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG–PET in patients with colorectal cancer

Abstract: The degree of chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism is highly predictive for patient outcome. The use of FDG-PET for therapy monitoring seems clinically feasible since simplified methods (SUV) are sufficiently reliable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
86
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies (Table 1) reported the predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET in patients treated with chemotherapy for nonresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). As early as 1996, Findlay et al (10) studied 18 patients before, at 1-2 wk after, and at 4-5 wk after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy with or without interferon-a by using a nondedicated PET system with a limited resolution.…”
Section: Chemotherapy Response Monitoring In Advanced Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five studies (Table 1) reported the predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET in patients treated with chemotherapy for nonresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). As early as 1996, Findlay et al (10) studied 18 patients before, at 1-2 wk after, and at 4-5 wk after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy with or without interferon-a by using a nondedicated PET system with a limited resolution.…”
Section: Chemotherapy Response Monitoring In Advanced Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that a combination of kinetic parameters from the first scan (at baseline) and the third scan (at 8 wk) provided the best results for classification into short-and long-term survival classes (defined as survival of ,1 y and .1 y, respectively). The authors suggested that quantitative dynamic 18 F-FDG PET should be used preferentially for chemotherapy response monitoring A recent study (14) showed that 18 F-FDG PET could be readily implemented without the need for complex dynamic imaging protocols. It was demonstrated that simplified measures (e.g., SUVs) can replace more complex quantitative measures (e.g., rate of metabolism of glucose [MR glu ]).…”
Section: Chemotherapy Response Monitoring In Advanced Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with morphologic imaging modalities such as CT and MRI, PET with the glucose analog 18 F-FDG returned superior results in monitoring therapy response and predicting survival in patients with various tumors (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The first published results indicate a high prognostic power for 18 F-FDG PET in the prediction of survival after SIRT in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 F-FDG uptake can be quantified by glucose metabolic rates (MR glc ) derived from dynamic 18 F-FDG PET data. The value of baseline MR glc as a predictive parameter for treatment outcome has been shown for several tumor types, including non-small cell lung carcinoma and CRC (9), and its predictive value using changes in MR glc for the early evaluation of response during chemotherapy has been shown in many tumor types, including non-small cell lung carcinoma (10) and CRC (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%