2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chempy: A flexible chemical evolution model for abundance fitting

Abstract: Elemental abundances of stars are the result of the complex enrichment history of their galaxy. Interpretation of observed abundances requires flexible modeling tools to explore and quantify the information about Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) stored in such data. Here we present Chempy, a newly developed code for GCE modeling, representing a parametrized open one-zone model within a Bayesian framework. A Chempy model is specified by a set of five to ten parameters that describe the effective galaxy evoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
14
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three CCSN yield models underpredict Mg production relative to O and Si, as found previously by S16 and Rybizki et al (2017). If the predicted Mg yields were boosted by a factor of ∼ 1.5 − 2, then the Chempy CCSN yield models would bracket or be close to our empirical inferences for most elements, and the S16 yields would be in reasonable agreement for most elements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All three CCSN yield models underpredict Mg production relative to O and Si, as found previously by S16 and Rybizki et al (2017). If the predicted Mg yields were boosted by a factor of ∼ 1.5 − 2, then the Chempy CCSN yield models would bracket or be close to our empirical inferences for most elements, and the S16 yields would be in reasonable agreement for most elements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results in the lower panel of Figure 17 can be compared qualitatively to those in Figure 14 of Rybizki et al (2017) and Figure 24 of S16. The former compares the predictions of the full Chempy chemical evolution models, including SNIa and AGB contributions, to proto-solar abundances.…”
Section: Comparison To Theoretical Yieldssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations