2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2004.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chern–Simons theory on R3 in axial gauge: a rigorous approach

Abstract: We study pure Chern-Simons models on M ¼ R 3 using a functional integral quantization approach which is based on axial gauge fixing. It is well-known (see, e.g., Comm. Math. Phys. 126 (1989) 167; Comm. Math. Phys. 186 (1997) 563) that in axial gauge the Chern-Simons action function is quadratic and that the Faddeev-Popov determinant of this gauge fixing procedure is a constant function. This means that the Wilson loop observables (WLOs) of the model considered can be obtained heuristically by integrating cer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where exp := exp C ∞ (M,G) : C ∞ (M, g) → C ∞ (M, G) is the "pointwise" exponential map. From the chain rule and the relation (d exp G ) |0 = id g which, informally, implies d exp |0 = id C ∞ (M,g) we obtain for every A 0 ∈ A gf △ F P [A 0 ] = △ F P (A 0 , 1) = det(Ψ • dq |(A 0 ,1) ) = det(dH |(A 0 ,0) ) (C. 21) where dH is now the "usual" total differential of a smooth map between (infinite-dimensional) vector spaces. 36 clearly, △F P (A0, Ω0) depends on Ψ via a multiplicative constant but this is irrelevant for our purposes 37 we emphasize that the translation part Ω −1 0 dΩ0 in q(A0, Ω0) = A0 · Ω0 = Ω −1 0 A0Ω0 + Ω −1 0 dΩ0 does not make an appearance in dq |(A 0 ,Ω 0 ) if the identifications (C.17) above are used 38 since we are arguing on a heuristic level we will not bother to specify a topology here…”
Section: Appendix C: Some Comments On the Faddeev-popov Determinantmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where exp := exp C ∞ (M,G) : C ∞ (M, g) → C ∞ (M, G) is the "pointwise" exponential map. From the chain rule and the relation (d exp G ) |0 = id g which, informally, implies d exp |0 = id C ∞ (M,g) we obtain for every A 0 ∈ A gf △ F P [A 0 ] = △ F P (A 0 , 1) = det(Ψ • dq |(A 0 ,1) ) = det(dH |(A 0 ,0) ) (C. 21) where dH is now the "usual" total differential of a smooth map between (infinite-dimensional) vector spaces. 36 clearly, △F P (A0, Ω0) depends on Ψ via a multiplicative constant but this is irrelevant for our purposes 37 we emphasize that the translation part Ω −1 0 dΩ0 in q(A0, Ω0) = A0 · Ω0 = Ω −1 0 A0Ω0 + Ω −1 0 dΩ0 does not make an appearance in dq |(A 0 ,Ω 0 ) if the identifications (C.17) above are used 38 since we are arguing on a heuristic level we will not bother to specify a topology here…”
Section: Appendix C: Some Comments On the Faddeev-popov Determinantmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One word of caution is appropriate here, though: it is not not totally impossible that something similar will happen as in the axial gauge approach to Chern-Simons models on R 3 , cf. [19,4,21,22]. In [22] it turned out that, in the Non-Abelian case, the expressions for the WLOs obtained for links with double points depended on the precise way in which the loop smearing regularization procedure was implemented.…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations