2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06934-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest CT for detecting COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this article was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the diagnostic test accuracy of chest CT for detecting coronavirus disease 2019 . Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched up to March 12, 2020. We included studies providing information regarding diagnostic test accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 detection. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
176
5
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
176
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…What would be desirable is a rapid and phenotypic test on the host that indicates the presence, and if possible the severity, of the consequences of infection. Presently, the standard method for this is based on CT chest scans for pneumonia, which have high sensitivity but lower specificity (see (5)(6)(7) and below), but this is neither cheap nor universally available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would be desirable is a rapid and phenotypic test on the host that indicates the presence, and if possible the severity, of the consequences of infection. Presently, the standard method for this is based on CT chest scans for pneumonia, which have high sensitivity but lower specificity (see (5)(6)(7) and below), but this is neither cheap nor universally available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the sensitivity of SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR is significantly higher for BAL versus nasopharyngeal specimens (~90‐95% versus ~60‐80%), variable resource availability among donor hospitals may limit the safety and feasibility of performing BAL, supporting the high prevalence of nasopharyngeal tests among donors in our study 22,25,26 . While chest computed tomography (CT) is highly sensitive (~97%) for detecting COVID‐19 and may help identify false‐negative nasopharyngeal tests, the specificity of CT is poor (~25%), 22,27 suggesting that routine use of CT in donor screening may result in considerable false positives, and avoidance of otherwise suitable donors. At our institution, ground glass opacities on CT were not considered sufficient to rule‐out donors in the absence of positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR and risk factors concerning for recent COVID‐19 exposure or infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…During these difficult days of the worldwide pandemic, the proposed MULTI-DEEP CAD system has great potential to be used as a tool for COVID-19 detection. It was verified that CT provides a convenient and effective method to primary identify suspicious cases (Xu et al, 2020;Long et al, 2020). Thus, the proposed system can detect COVID-19 cases early, thereby avoiding the fast spread of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%