Chest wall desmoid tumours treated with definitive radiotherapy: a plan comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy

Abstract

PurposeDefinitive radiotherapy is often used for chest wall desmoid tumours due to size or anatomical location. The delivery of radiotherapy is challenging due to the large size and constraints of normal surrounding structures. We compared the dosimetry of 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) to evaluate the best treatment option.Methods and materialsTen consecutive patients with inoperable chest wall desmoid tumours (PTV range 416–4549 cm3) were selected. For each patient, 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT plans were generated and the Conformity Index (CI), organ at risk (OAR) doses and monitor unit (MU) were evaluated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dose delivered to both target and OARs.ResultsThe mean number of fields for 3DCRT and IMRT were 6.3 ± 2.1, 7.2 ± 1.8. The mean number of arcs for VMAT was 3.7 ± 1.1. The mean conformity index of VMAT (0.98 ± 0.14) was similar to that of IMRT (1.03 ± 0.13), both of which were significantly better than 3DCRT (1.35 ± 0.20; p = 0.005).The mean dose to lung was significantly higher for 3DCRT (11.9Gy ± 7.9) compared to IMRT (9.4Gy ± 5.4, p = 0.014) and VMAT (8.9Gy ± 4.5, p = 0.017). For the 3 females, the low dose regions in the ipsilateral breast for VMAT were generally less with VMAT. IMRT plans required 1427 ± 532 MU per fraction which was almost 4-fold higher than 3DCRT (313 ± 112, P = 0.005). Compared to IMRT, VMAT plans required 60 % less MU (570 ± 285, P = 0.005).ConclusionsFor inoperable chest wall desmoid tumours, VMAT delivered equivalent target coverage when compared to IMRT but required 60 % less MU. Both VMAT and IMRT were superior to 3DCRT in terms of better PTV coverage and sparing of lung tissue.

Significant symptoms alleviation and tumor volume reduction after combined simultaneously integrated inner-escalated boost and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in a patient with unresectable bulky hepatocellular carcinoma

“…Strength 1 : As mentioned above, in conducting SIB technique, several RT techniques may be used, such as IMRT [ 41 – 43 ] and VMAT. [ 44 – 46 ] In general, when compared with IMRT, VMAT demonstrates a similar target coverage [ 60 ] but with a better radiation dosimetric profile. [ 61 ] The present case used VMAT to conduct a modified-SIB (i.e., SIEB-VMAT), focusing on both intratumor dose escalation and extra-tumor dose attenuation, achieving a good tumor control with minimized treatment toxicities.…”

Proton Therapy in Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Children and Adolescents

“…Although published data show improved local control with the evolution of photon techniques in the treatment of NRSTS [58,61], the widespread advent of particle therapy facilities worldwide is generating significant interest in the pediatric sarcoma community, aiming to identify effective and less toxic treatment.…”

Mesenchymal Tumors of the Breast: Fibroblastic/Myofibroblastic Lesions and Other Lesions

“…Radiation has high reported local control rates. Delivery is challenged by the large sizes and risk to normal tissue of surrounding structures as well as the risk of secondary neoplasms [42]. Radiation can be considered after medical therapies have been exhausted and though it can be considered primarily, ideally it would be for sites where local control is difficult to achieve surgically, for patients who are not surgical candidates, or for recurrences.…”