2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicxulub impact event is Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in age: New micropaleontological evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are all consistent with the more widely accepted interpretation that Chicxulub is of K-P age [e.g. 9, 38], and contrasting biostratigraphical interpretations of the micropaleontological data [48].…”
Section: Stratigraphic Interpretations Of Cretaceous and Paleocene Sesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These observations are all consistent with the more widely accepted interpretation that Chicxulub is of K-P age [e.g. 9, 38], and contrasting biostratigraphical interpretations of the micropaleontological data [48].…”
Section: Stratigraphic Interpretations Of Cretaceous and Paleocene Sesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…With regard to the recent controversy that Chicxulub and the K/P impact event could signify the occurrence of two massive impact events in rapid succession, see, e.g., Keller et al (2004). However, this has been rejected most recently by e.g., Arenillas et al (2006) and Schulte et al (2006). The number of confirmed impact structures on Earth, thereafter, has slowly increased further, standing now at about 170, with several others proposed but not unequivocally confirmed yet.…”
Section: What Is the Current Terrestrial Impact Record?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these studies have involved, among other investigations, extensive geophysical surveys and modeling; drilling and coring; laboratory analyses for geochemistry, isotopes, petrology, mineralogy, and physical properties; stratigraphy; and numerical simulations [ Urrutia-Fucugauchi et al, 2011]. Through these methods, studies continue to point to the Chicxulub impact as the leading candidate for the K-Pg mass extinction [Arenillas et al, 2007;Schulte et al, 2010].…”
Section: Studies On the Impact Structure And Its Relationship To The mentioning
confidence: 99%