Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet
DOI: 10.4337/9781849805049.00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child abuse images and cleanfeeds: assessing internet blocking systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Project attempts to prevent people from deliberately or accidentally accessing illegal sites in the UK and abroad. UK security officials believe that CleanFeed is able to block access to the majority of child pornography (McIntyre ). At the same time, online child sex offenders and paedophiles are making great strides at circumventing regulation.…”
Section: What Can Be Done?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Project attempts to prevent people from deliberately or accidentally accessing illegal sites in the UK and abroad. UK security officials believe that CleanFeed is able to block access to the majority of child pornography (McIntyre ). At the same time, online child sex offenders and paedophiles are making great strides at circumventing regulation.…”
Section: What Can Be Done?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuando Bing filtra los resultados para los usuarios en lengua árabe, o YouTube suspende la cuenta de un usuario por 58 De Nardis (2013: 571-572). 59 McIntyre (2012). 60 Faris y Heacock (2013: 2).…”
unclassified
“…These technologies have been used by more repressive regimes such as China and Saudi Arabia to limit access to information through the use of centralised firewall systems (R Deibert, Palfrey, Rohozinski, & Zittrain, 2008,. but also through the use of specific filtering systems used to prevent access to content considered illegal, such as child abuse material or materials deemed to infringe copyright in 'Western liberal' democracies (R Deibert et al, 2010;Goldsmith & Wu, 2006;McIntyre, 2012)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%