2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child bystanding: A risk factor for injury and identifying its’ determinants on midwestern agricultural operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no statistically significant differences between first- and multi-generation respondents in child injury, perceptions on agricultural safety and farm safety knowledge, and practices. Furthermore, we found a contradiction in our sample between farm safety perceptions and practices based on the previous literature that found an association between these factors and farm injury (see, for example, [ 29 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 75 ]). In particular, there was a high level of perceived safety in agriculture compared to other occupations and high level of confidence in farm safety knowledge and the ability to supervise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found no statistically significant differences between first- and multi-generation respondents in child injury, perceptions on agricultural safety and farm safety knowledge, and practices. Furthermore, we found a contradiction in our sample between farm safety perceptions and practices based on the previous literature that found an association between these factors and farm injury (see, for example, [ 29 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 75 ]). In particular, there was a high level of perceived safety in agriculture compared to other occupations and high level of confidence in farm safety knowledge and the ability to supervise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…For over three decades, farm safety scholars have sought to identify the factors associated with variations in farm children’s risk exposure to develop interventions to address these risks. They have assessed the role played by demographic characteristics of farm parents’ (gender, number of children, off-farm employment, and educational attainment) [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] attitudes, norms, and parenting styles [ 24 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], characteristics of farm operation (namely, the type of commodity produced, scale of operation, and more recently, marketing channels and growing practices) [ 25 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. An extensive body of work has also considered the intersection between farm risk exposure and farm safety practices with children’s demographics (specifically age and gender) [ 24 , 25 , 30 , 32 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], safety equipment used, tasks given, and presence on the farm [ 25 , 26 , 31 , 37 , 40 , 43 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The community based health education intervention should target education of mothers and caregivers for the prevention of childhood injuries in home environment. Infants accompany the mother to the farm where they are exposed to risk of injury [17]. Hence, in the present study farm was the second most common place of injuries among infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%