2016
DOI: 10.1111/sode.12196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child‐caregiver Attachment Representations in a Non‐Western Context: The Feasibility and Cultural Equivalence of Story Stems in Urban Ghana

Abstract: Story stem measures are an increasingly popular method for assessing the attachment representations of young children, but little is known of their cross‐cultural applicability. This study aimed to characterise the attachment representations in 73 five‐ to eight‐year‐old children in urban Ghana, West Africa, using the Manchester Child Attachment Story Task (MCAST) to test its feasibility, psychometric characteristics and concurrent associations with caregiver‐ and teacher‐rated child behaviour, and to conduct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of four‐way attachment classifications according to the MCAST was 73.5% secure (B) (n = 86), 9.4% avoidant (A) (n = 11), 15.4% ambivalent (C) (n = 18) and 1.7% disorganized (D) (n = 2) with respect to mother, and 68.3% secure (B) (n = 82), 16.7% avoidant (A) (n = 20), 10% ambivalent (C) (n = 12) and 5% disorganized (D) (n = 6) with respect to father. This attachment distribution is consistent with meta‐analytical data for this age group (Lucassen et al , ), but the proportion of secure attachments is somewhat higher than reported in other studies with the MCAST (Bernier & Miljkovitch, ; Wan, Danquah & Mahama, ). Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate whether demographic variables (child's age, gender, and verbal intelligence) were related to the MCAST continuous subscales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The distribution of four‐way attachment classifications according to the MCAST was 73.5% secure (B) (n = 86), 9.4% avoidant (A) (n = 11), 15.4% ambivalent (C) (n = 18) and 1.7% disorganized (D) (n = 2) with respect to mother, and 68.3% secure (B) (n = 82), 16.7% avoidant (A) (n = 20), 10% ambivalent (C) (n = 12) and 5% disorganized (D) (n = 6) with respect to father. This attachment distribution is consistent with meta‐analytical data for this age group (Lucassen et al , ), but the proportion of secure attachments is somewhat higher than reported in other studies with the MCAST (Bernier & Miljkovitch, ; Wan, Danquah & Mahama, ). Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate whether demographic variables (child's age, gender, and verbal intelligence) were related to the MCAST continuous subscales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, capturing reliable data from such young children through assessments and surveys presented certain practical difficulties. For example, some learners did not know their birth dates or even their age, and so it was necessary to rely on the information recorded in school registers (Mwaura et al, 2008;Wan et al, 2017). Future research would ideally corroborate pupils' responses on household factors with data collected from their parents, guardians or other caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change are required, as are studies investigating attachment measures in a range of different sociocultural contexts. Recent studies conducted in Africa and Asia (Sochos & Lokshum, 2017;Wan et al, 2017) are a welcome development for the field; more such studies are needed.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%