1975
DOI: 10.2307/1191273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0
5

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
151
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Canada or Belgium, cf. Mabry, 2011;Mnookin and Verbeke, 2009), whereas language conflicts are less common in other multilingual countries (Kreander and Sundberg 2007). Finland, for example, is a multilingual market with a history of political compromises concerning language (Andersson and Herberts 1996).…”
Section: H4: Perceived Second Language Proficiency Moderates the Inflmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canada or Belgium, cf. Mabry, 2011;Mnookin and Verbeke, 2009), whereas language conflicts are less common in other multilingual countries (Kreander and Sundberg 2007). Finland, for example, is a multilingual market with a history of political compromises concerning language (Andersson and Herberts 1996).…”
Section: H4: Perceived Second Language Proficiency Moderates the Inflmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are additional problems in deciding what the measure of 'best' is to be. Mnookin (1975) states that this 'poses a question no less ultimate than the purposes and values of life itself'. Despite this, the welfare test is still felt to have an important symbolic and moral value, reminding us that children must be protected from harm and given every opportunity to become healthy, well-developed adults (King, 1987;Cretney and Masson, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…363A.03, of a proposed custodian or the child shall not be determinative of the custody of the child, unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child); the capacity and disposition of the parties to give the child love, affection, and guidance, and to continue educating and raising the child in the child's culture and religion or creed, if any; the child's cultural background; the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser, if related to domestic abuse, as defined in section 518B.01, that has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual, whether or not the individual alleged to have committed domestic abuse is or ever was a family or household member of the parent; and except in cases in which a finding of domestic abuse as defined in section 518B.01 has been made, the disposition of each parent to encourage and permit frequent and continuing contact by the other parent with the child [12]. Far from clear, the standard has been described as vague and indeterminate due to the varying determinations among states' methods in deciding the custody arrangement [13]. Furthermore, even when the evidence supports a different conclusion, the trial court's custody determination will not be disturbed if the evidence supports the trial court's conclusions [14].…”
Section: A Overview Of Custody Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%