Child perceptions questionnaire 11-14 in Turkish language in an orthodontic patient sample

Abstract

PurposeThe Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11–14 (CPQ 11–14) is a generic tool that was developed to measure oral health-related quality of life in early adolescents. The aim of this study was to prepare a Turkish version of the CPQ 11–14 and to test its psychometric properties in an adolescent orthodontic patient sample.Materials and MethodsThe questionnaire was adapted to Turkish using a forward backward translation method, and it was found to be understandable in a pilot study (n=15). The Turkish version of the CPQ 11–14 was administered to 200 orthodontic consultation patients (aged 11–14 years). Retests were conducted in 50 patients 2 weeks after the first tests. The ICON index was used to determine the orthodontic treatment need. Decayed, missing, and filled teeth were also recorded with the DMFT index. Spearman correlations and t-tests were used to assess validity. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess test–retest reliability.ResultsSignificant positive correlations were found between CPQ 11–14 scores and the global ratings of oral health (r=0.381), global ratings of well-being (r=0.350), ICON scores (r=0.211), and DMFT scores (r=0.233), supporting construct validity. Children who needed orthodontic treatment had a worse quality of life than those who did not need orthodontic treatment (p=0.016). Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated as 0.917 and 0.817, respectively, demonstrating good internal consistency and acceptable test–retest reliability.ConclusionThe Turkish version of the CPQ 11–14 was found to be valid and reliable in 11–14-year-old orthodontic patients.

Influence of malocclusion on OHRQoL in adolescents in initial orthodontic treatment phase

“…Amongst them, the Child Perceptions Questionnaire [ 31 ] has been widely tested and validated [ 20 , 36 ] and has already been used in the orthodontic field [ 13 , 14 ]. Different language versions exist, making the questionnaire a promising tool for international collaboration [ 25 , 37 , 38 ]. Other validated instruments are the Pediatric Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (POQL) [ 34 ], Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Score (ECOHIS) [ 35 ], Child Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (Child-OIDP) [ 33 ], and the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) [ 32 ].…”

Cross-Bite and Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Preadolescents Aged 11 to 14 Years Old: A Pilot Case-Control Study

“…The CPQ 11–14 is the most commonly used tool to analyse OHRQoL in children. This questionnaire is a valid tool for measuring COHQoL and has been extensively validated in different countries [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 36 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. In this study, the use of this questionnaire was considered appropriate for the sample studied.…”

“…The CPQ-Esp 11–14 has a Likert scale structure, and the answer options are: “0 = Never”, “1 = Once/Twice”, “2 = Sometimes”, “3 = Often”, and “4 = Every Day/Almost Every Day” [ 28 ]. Higher scores indicate a worse OHRQoL [ 36 ]. Two short versions of CPQ-Esp 11–14 have been developed: an 8-question version and a 16-question version [ 37 ].…”

Impact of Angle malocclusions on oral health related quality of life in adolescents

“…A minimum sample size of 55 subjects in each group was proposed to determine a difference of 20% in the impact of a malocclusion on QoL between Angle Class I, II and III, with 80% power at a 95% confidence interval. 13 The exclusion criteria of the participants were: The Child Perception Questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ 11-14 ), which was previously validated in Turkish by Aydogan et al 15 and Bekiroglu et al 16 , was used to evaluate the OHRQoL of individuals. The Turkish version of the CPQ 11-14 was administered to 83 individuals (39 males, 44 females) who had a Class I malocclusion, 111 individuals (46 males, 65 females) with a Class II Division 1 malocclusions, and 63 individuals (28 males, 35 females) with a Class III malocclusion.…”