2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00335.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Poverty Among Racial Minorities and Immigrants: Explaining Trends and Differentials*

Abstract: Objective. This article examines the effects of changing family structure (including cohabitation) and maternal employment during the 1990s on child poverty rates across America's diverse racial and ethnic groups. Unlike most previous studies focused on broad pan‐ethnic groups, our analyses examine children distinguished by race/ethnicity, immigrant generation, and national origin (e.g., Mexican, Japanese, Middle Eastern, among others). Methods. The analyses, using methods of demographic standardization, are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the changing nature of family and household composition require poverty scholars to consider how family demographic trends complicate the issue of assessing poverty and have made traditional family poverty measures less relevant and recommend new thinking in this regard (Lichter, 2006;Lichter et al, 2005). For these reasons we use a household level as the unit of analysis when examining poverty and all other economic well-being outcomes in this study.…”
Section: Economic Well-being Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the changing nature of family and household composition require poverty scholars to consider how family demographic trends complicate the issue of assessing poverty and have made traditional family poverty measures less relevant and recommend new thinking in this regard (Lichter, 2006;Lichter et al, 2005). For these reasons we use a household level as the unit of analysis when examining poverty and all other economic well-being outcomes in this study.…”
Section: Economic Well-being Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the national level, the growing proportion of children living in female-headed families is a primary reason for long-term rises in child poverty, 3 while rising labor force participation rates among mothers, especially single mothers, have been an important hedge against child poverty over the past decade (Iceland 2004;Lichter et al 2005). …”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of these weighted, group-specific rates tells us what the poverty rate would have been if the population had been differently distributed into subgroups-a ''standard population'' (in contrast to the observed population; Preston et al 2001). This approach has been recently used to determine how much of the decline in child poverty between 1992 and 2001 was attributable to shifts in maternal employment (Lichter and Crowley 2004) and how much of the decline in child poverty between 1990 and 2000 was attributable to compositional shifts in family structure versus maternal employment (Lichter et al 2005). We use the Categorical Data Analysis System (CDAS), Version 3.5 (Eliason 2003), to investigate the degree to which compositional shifts (in family structure and maternal work) affects poverty trends among native-born and immigrant Chinese children distinguished by place of birth.…”
Section: Data and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…child poverty rates (Lichter et al 2005). Although employment does not dictate selfsufficiency or the ability to escape poverty (for example, see Bok and Simmons 2002), potential benefits from employment and stringent work requirements under TANF call into question what facilitates unmarried mothers' employment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%