2018
DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Therapist Pregnancy: Systematic Case Study

Abstract: The present study aimed to describe the characteristics of the psychodynamic psychotherapeutic process of a child with a pregnant therapist and to identify possible repercussions of this pregnancy in the treatment. A descriptive, longitudinal study was conducted, based on systematic single case study procedure. The participants were an eight-year-old girl and her therapist who became pregnant during treatment. Forty psychotherapeutic sessions were analyzed through Child Psychotherapy Q-Set procedure. The thera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While new prospective methods to explore the clinical impact of therapist pregnancy are emerging (Schmidt, Gastaud & Ramires, 2018), published enquiries into pregnant and post-partum therapists' experiences of pregnancy have often lacked sufficient methodological rigour, using personal reflections and case vignettes to illustrate potential clinical issues (i.e., McGourty, 2013;Miller & Giffin, 2019;Silverman, 2001;Whyte, 2004). Alternatively, studies purporting to use empirical methodologies have tended to summarise interview data without including raw transcript excerpts (i.e., Bassen, 1988;Baum & Herring, 1975;Naparstek, 1976), thus limiting opportunities to assess study transparency and validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While new prospective methods to explore the clinical impact of therapist pregnancy are emerging (Schmidt, Gastaud & Ramires, 2018), published enquiries into pregnant and post-partum therapists' experiences of pregnancy have often lacked sufficient methodological rigour, using personal reflections and case vignettes to illustrate potential clinical issues (i.e., McGourty, 2013;Miller & Giffin, 2019;Silverman, 2001;Whyte, 2004). Alternatively, studies purporting to use empirical methodologies have tended to summarise interview data without including raw transcript excerpts (i.e., Bassen, 1988;Baum & Herring, 1975;Naparstek, 1976), thus limiting opportunities to assess study transparency and validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%