Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q): Validation among Spanish adolescents

Contreras, Lourdes; Bustos, Claudio; Cano-Lozano, M. Carmen

doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.09.001

Cited by 48 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, there have been some proposals of new assessment tools for CPV, such as the Childto-Mother Violence Scale (Edenborough, Wilkes, Jackson, & Mannix, 2011), designed to capture the prevalence, experience, and nature of child-to-mother violence, and the Intra-family Violence Scale (Ibabe et al, 2013), with nine items designed to assess the presence of violence toward parents, parent-to-child violence and betweenparent violence. Other recent tools are the Child-to-Parent Aggression Questionnaire (Calvete et al, 2016), with a revised version including reasons for the abuse (Calvete & Orue, 2016), and the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire (Contreras, Bustos-Navarrete, & Cano-Lozano, 2019), focused on type and prevalence of violence committed, as well as self-reported reasons for the acts by the aggressors.…”

Section: Research On Cpv: What Do We Know?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Risk and Protective Factors in Clinical and Judicial Child-to-Parent Violence Cases

Loinaz

Sousa

2019

The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TChild-to-parent violence takes different forms (physical, psychological or economic) and can be addressed in the judicial system or in clinical practice. The current paper compares 61 clinical and 30 judicialized cases that were evaluated using the Child-to-Parent Violence Risk assessment tool (CPVR). Results showed a higher prevalence of risk factors in the judicial sample. This group of aggressors had worse profiles of violence (bidirectionality of the parent/child violence, violence other than CPV, and more CPV complaints), more psychological issues (low frustration tolerance, little anger management, narcissism, and violent attitudes) and, most notably, more dysfunctional families (violence between parents, cohabitation problems, inversion of the hierarchy, non-violent conflicts, and even criminal history of the parents). Logistic regression showed that narcissism, attitudes justifying violence, violence between parents, and problems of parents themselves (such mental disorders or drug abuse) allowed for correct classification of 89.4% of cases. Total CPVR scores differed between groups (25.8 vs. 14.2), and classification was good for both type of group (AUC = .830) and injuries to mother (AUC = .764). A cut-off score between 22 and 23 showed the best results in prediction of group and injuries to mother. Utility of the CPVR, and next steps in its development are discussed.La evaluación de factores de riesgo y de protección en casos clínicos y judiciales de violencia filio-parental R E S U M E N La Violencia Filio-Parental (VFP) puede manifestarse de distintas formas (física, psicológica o económica) y su abordaje puede hacerse desde el sistema judicial o desde la práctica clínica. El presente estudio compara 61 casos clínicos (no judicializados) y 30 judicializados que fueron evaluados con la Guía para la Valoración del Riesgo de Violencia Filio-Parental (RVFP). Los resultados mostraron una mayor prevalencia de los factores de riesgo en la muestra judicial, con un perfil de violencia peor (más bidireccionalidad, más violencia distinta a la VFP y más denuncias por VFP), más complicaciones psicológicas en los agresores (baja tolerancia a la frustración, poco control de la ira, narcisismo y actitudes violentas) y, en especial, un perfil familiar más disfuncional (violencia entre los padres, problemas de convivencia, inversión de jerarquía, conflictos e incluso antecedentes delictivos en los padres). Una regresión logística puso de manifiesto que el narcisismo, las actitudes que justifican la violencia, la violencia entre los progenitores y los problemas de los padres (como trastorno mental o abuso de drogas) permitían clasificar correctamente al 89.4% de los casos. El grupo midió diferencias en la puntuación en la Guía RVFP (25.8 vs. 14.2) y la clasificación fue buena para el tipo de grupo (AUC = .830) y lesiones a la madre (AUC = .764). Un punto de corte entre 22 y 23 mostró los mejores resultados en la predicción del grupo y las lesiones a la madre. Se discute la utilidad de la RVFP y los sigui...

show abstract

Section: Research On Cpv: What Do We Know?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Risk and Protective Factors in Clinical and Judicial Child-to-Parent Violence Cases

Loinaz

Sousa

2019

The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is essential to expand the samples to confirm the risk variables and gender differences. It would also be of interest to complement the use of the CPVR (Loinaz et al, 2017;Loinaz & Ma de Sousa, 2020) with other tools designed to assess CPV, such as the Child to-Mother Violence Scale (Edenborough, Wilkes, Jackson, & Mannix, 2011), the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) (Contreras, Bustos-Navarrete, & Cano, 2019), the Child-to-Parent Aggression Questionnaire (CPAQ) (Calvete et al, 2013;Del Hoyo-Bilbao et al, 2018) or the Abusive Behaviour by Children-Indices (ABC-I) (Simmons et al, 2019).…”

Section: Characteristics Of Offenders and Victimsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender differences in child to parent violence risk factors

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La violencia filio-parental (VFP) ha suscitado un enorme interés académico. Pese a ello, pocos estudios comparan los factores de riesgo de chicos y chicas implicados en estas agresiones a sus progenitores. El presente trabajo compara 56 chicos y 35 chicas agresores evaluados con la Guía para la Valoración del Riesgo de Violencia Filio-Parental (RVFP). Las chicas provenían de forma significativa de contextos más problemáticos (con bidireccionalidad de la violencia, violencia entre los progenitores, problemas de convivencia y problemas en los progenitores) y tenían significativamente menos autoestima. Los chicos presentaron significativamente más historial de problemas de abusos de sustancias y mayor escalada en la violencia. En conjunto, ambos sexos presentaban prevalencias similares en la mayoría de las variables, su violencia era comparable (aunque las lesiones a los padres fueron exclusivas de los chicos) y las familias eran más problemáticas en ellas. La predicción de las lesiones a la madre con la puntuación del RVFP fue significativa en el caso de los varones (AUC = ,842) pero no en el caso de ellas (AUC = ,660). Los resultados justifican el uso de tratamientos y herramientas comunes en chicos y chicas implicados en VFP, aunque se discuten desarrollos aún necesarios en la materia. Child-to-parent violence (CPV) has attracted enormous academic interest. Despite this, few studies compare the risk factors between female and male perpetrators of this abuse toward parents. This paper compares 56 male and 35 female CPV offenders, evaluated with the Child-to-Parent Violence Risk assessment tool (CPVR). Results show that girls came from significantly more problematic contexts (with bidirectionality of violence, violence between parents, cohabitation problems and personal problems of parents, and had significantly lower self-esteem. Boys had significantly more histories of substance abuse issues and greater rates of escalation of violence. Overall, both sexes had similar prevalence rates for most variables, the type of violence committed was comparable (although injuries toward fathers were only perpetrated by boys), and female perpetrators had more problematic families than their male counterparts. CPVR scores significantly predicted injuries toward the mother for male offenders (AUC = .842), but not for female offenders (AUC = .660). These results support the use of common treatments and tools for female and male CPV offenders. Future steps and developments in the field are also discussed.

show abstract

“…-Cuestionario de Violencia Filio-parental (C-VIFIP; Contreras et al, 2019). Este instrumento incluye 14 ítems paralelos (referidos a la madre y al padre) que evalúan diferentes conductas de violencia psicológica (4 ítems), física (3 ítems) y económica (3 ítems), así como conductas de control y dominio sobre los padres (4 ítems).…”

Section: Instrumentosunclassified

“…Por tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue examinar la prevalencia y las razones para la violencia filio-parental en una muestra de adolescentes españoles, examinando las diferencias de género tanto en agresores como en víctimas. Se evaluó a un total de 1.624 adolescentes españoles con el C-VIFIP (Contreras, Bustos-Navarrete, y Cano-Lozano, 2019). Los resultados mostraron que las madres son las víctimas más frecuentes en algunos tipos de agresiones, siendo las chicas más agresivas que los chicos en algunos tipos de conductas.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prevalencia Y Razones Para La Violencia Filio-Parental en Adolescentes Españoles: Diferencias De Género en Víctimas Y Agresores / [Prevalence and Reasons for Child-to-Parent Violence in Spanish Adolescents: Gender Differences in Victims and Aggressors]

Contreras¹,

Rodríguez-Díaz²,

Cano-Lozano³

2020

Colección Psicología Y Ley

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adolescent violence against parents is a phenomenon on the rise, which has promoted in recent years a growing body of research in different countries. However, to concrete the prevalence is complex, as victims tend to hide to abuse, so official data refer to those cases reported at the Juvenile Court. Studies with community samples of adolescents can provide information about the extent on this issue in general society. Nevertheless, literature reveals a great disparity of data on prevalence of child-to-parent violence across the studies and, furthermore, research about the reasons for these types of behaviours are very scarce. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine the prevalence and the reasons for child-to-parent violence in a wide sample of Spanish

show abstract

Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q): Validation among Spanish adolescents

Cited by 48 publications

References 22 publications

Assessing Risk and Protective Factors in Clinical and Judicial Child-to-Parent Violence Cases

Assessing Risk and Protective Factors in Clinical and Judicial Child-to-Parent Violence Cases

Gender differences in child to parent violence risk factors

Prevalencia Y Razones Para La Violencia Filio-Parental en Adolescentes Españoles: Diferencias De Género en Víctimas Y Agresores / [Prevalence and Reasons for Child-to-Parent Violence in Spanish Adolescents: Gender Differences in Victims and Aggressors]

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About