2016
DOI: 10.1080/15548732.2016.1275920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Welfare Practice Model Implementation Projects: Lessons Learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these findings, to meet the FFPSA legislation, continued focus on family engagement will be critical. Past CB-supported capacity building efforts to install practice models, which generally emphasize family engagement, found that such efforts require intensive engagement of leaders and a diverse group of stakeholders; attention to organizational culture and climate; and a continual process of building and revisiting staff knowledge and skills through training, coaching, supervision, and accountability systems (Lambert et al, 2016; Sanclimenti et al, 2016). Future evaluation results of CB capacity building efforts may find an increase in the number of hours devoted to jurisdictions to install such critical practice innovations that focus on family engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these findings, to meet the FFPSA legislation, continued focus on family engagement will be critical. Past CB-supported capacity building efforts to install practice models, which generally emphasize family engagement, found that such efforts require intensive engagement of leaders and a diverse group of stakeholders; attention to organizational culture and climate; and a continual process of building and revisiting staff knowledge and skills through training, coaching, supervision, and accountability systems (Lambert et al, 2016; Sanclimenti et al, 2016). Future evaluation results of CB capacity building efforts may find an increase in the number of hours devoted to jurisdictions to install such critical practice innovations that focus on family engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, implementing practice models in different contexts involves several implementation barriers that also create challenges to an outcome evaluation (e.g., Bostock et al, 2017;Roberts, Caslor, Turnell, Pearson, & Pecora, 2019). For example, previous studies have identified that e.g., leadership and organisational climate, training and coaching, alignment with other organisational systems and initiatives, time and resources and staff permanency influence implementation of practice models (Antle et al, 2012;Lambert, Richards, & Merrill, 2016;Sanclimenti, Caceda-Castro, & DeSantis, 2017;Sheehan et al, 2018). Despite this, rigorous evaluations within child protections have been successfully conducted (e.g., Chaffin et al, 2004) and these new models of practice are deserving of the same level of rigour in terms of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is essential to emphasize that assessing the initial implementation of the MIAF will offer invaluable insights to enhance the practice model. This step is crucial before considering scaling up or conducting a randomized control trial, as strongly recommended by implementation science frameworks [8,10]. Additionally, the study's focus on specific geographic regions within Portugal may restrict the generalizability of findings to the entire country.…”
Section: Limitations and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These frameworks help specify and operationalize caseworkers' skills and practices through different stages of the child welfare continuum [8,9]. As such, child welfare practice models have been found to enhance consistency in practice [10], facilitate the achievement of case goals and family engagement [11], and improve children's outcomes when implemented with fidelity [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%