Childhood Maltreatment: Altered Network Centrality of Cingulate, Precuneus, Temporal Pole and Insula

Abstract

Background Childhood abuse is a major risk factor for psychopathology. Previous studies have identified brain differences in maltreated individuals but have not focused on potential differences in network architecture. Methods High-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans were obtained from 265 unmedicated, right-handed 18-25-year-olds who were classified as maltreated (n=142, 55M/87F) or non-maltreated (n=123, 46M/77F) based on extensive interviews. Cortical thickness was assessed in 112 cortical regions (nodes) and inter-regional partial correlations across subjects were calculated to derive the lowest equivalent cost single-cluster group networks. Permutation tests were used to ascertain whether maltreatment was associated with significant alterations in key centrality measures of these regions and membership in the highly interconnected ‘rich club’. Results Marked differences in centrality (connectedness, ‘importance’) were observed in a handful of cortical regions. Left anterior cingulate had the second highest number of connections (degree centrality) and was a component of the ‘rich club’ in the control network but ranked low in connectedness (106th of 112 nodes) in the network derived from maltreated-subjects (p<0.01). Conversely, right precuneus and right anterior insula ranked first and 15th in degree centrality in the maltreated network versus 90th (p=0.01) and 105th (p<0.03) in the control network. Conclusions Maltreatment was associated with decreased centrality in regions involved in emotional regulation and ability to accurately attribute thoughts or intentions to others and with enhanced centrality in regions involved in internal emotional perception, self-referential thinking and self-awareness. This may provide a potential mechanism for how maltreatment increases risk for psychopathology.

FKBP5 modulates the hippocampal connectivity deficits in depression: a study in twins

“…The current data show that the right hippocampus has a more central position in the brain network of depressed individuals than in its healthy counterpart, which may lead to a disruption of information transfer mechanisms. Analogous eigenvector centrality alterations of some limbic brain regions have been found in other DWI studies of depression and related conditions (Qin et al 2014;Teicher et al 2014).…”

The role of timing of maltreatment and child intelligence in pathways to low symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescence

“…We offer two possible explanations of these findings. Firstly, the extant literature suggest a strong biological component of intelligence (Etkin, Egner, & Kalisch, 2011;Teicher, Anderson, Ohashi, & Polcari, 2014) and a strong biological component of anxiety (Grasso et al, 2013), while depression has been linked to cognitive style and selfesteem (McCauley, Pavlidis, & Kendall, 2001). The second explanation is based on the processing efficiency theory, which postulates that anxious individuals have difficulty suppressing threat information, therefore they possess reduced available resources for cognitive processing resulting in lower cognitive performance (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992).…”

Does sleep disruption mediate the effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure?

“…Participants provided written informed consent after the study was fully explained and questions answered. They were screened, recruited and evaluated using previously published methods (Khan et al, 2015; Teicher, Anderson, Ohashi, & Polcari, 2014). Recruited participants were medically healthy, right handed, 18–19 years of age, and unmedicated with the exception of oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy or occasional use of non-steroidal asthma inhalers or non-sedating antihistamines.…”