2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205019
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood socioeconomic position and physical capability in late-middle age in two birth cohorts from the Copenhagen aging and midlife biobank

Abstract: This study examines the association between childhood socioeconomic position and objective physical capability including new functional measures of potential relevance to a population in late-middle age. The study population covers two Danish birth cohorts followed-up in the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (age 48–58 years, 2009–2011, N = 4,204). Results from linear regression models revealed that being born in higher socioeconomic position was associated with higher jump height: Paternal occupational cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grip strength and, for women, chair stand score, increased by social position after adjustment for age, height and Inuit ancestry. This is in concordance with most studies of both social position in childhood [ 37 , 38 ] and later in life [ 39 , 40 ]. These studies have been carried out mostly in the UK and other European countries, but also Latin American countries showed an increase in muscle strength by social position [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Grip strength and, for women, chair stand score, increased by social position after adjustment for age, height and Inuit ancestry. This is in concordance with most studies of both social position in childhood [ 37 , 38 ] and later in life [ 39 , 40 ]. These studies have been carried out mostly in the UK and other European countries, but also Latin American countries showed an increase in muscle strength by social position [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%