2018
DOI: 10.1177/1077801218766628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood Trauma and Dissociative Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract: The present study assesses childhood abuse/neglect as a predictor of dissociative intimate partner violence (IPV) among 118 partner-abusive men. One third (36%) endorsed dissociative IPV, most commonly losing control (18%), surroundings seeming unreal (16%), feeling someone other than oneself is aggressing (16%), and seeing oneself from a distance aggressing (10%). Childhood physical abuse/neglect predicted IPV-specific derealization/depersonalization, aggressive self-states, and flashbacks to past violence. C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, Pathway 2 participants infrequently reported experiencing ongoing FV victimization in their relationships with event victims, but consistently described extensive childhood histories of FV victimization. These accounts are consistent with a large body of research reporting an association between childhood FV victimization and dissociative experiences in adulthood (Vonderlin et al, 2018), including more recent research findings that a large minority—22% to 36%—of FV perpetrators with histories of FV victimization have experienced dissociation while perpetrating FV (LaMotte & Murphy, 2017; Simoneti et al, 2000; Webermann & Murphy, 2019). Pathway 2 FVEs were also characterized by more severe physical FV than that described in Pathway 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, Pathway 2 participants infrequently reported experiencing ongoing FV victimization in their relationships with event victims, but consistently described extensive childhood histories of FV victimization. These accounts are consistent with a large body of research reporting an association between childhood FV victimization and dissociative experiences in adulthood (Vonderlin et al, 2018), including more recent research findings that a large minority—22% to 36%—of FV perpetrators with histories of FV victimization have experienced dissociation while perpetrating FV (LaMotte & Murphy, 2017; Simoneti et al, 2000; Webermann & Murphy, 2019). Pathway 2 FVEs were also characterized by more severe physical FV than that described in Pathway 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As previously discussed, this suggestion is consistent with an emerging body of research exploring perpetrators’ dissociative experiences during a FVE. Along these lines, participants’ childhood experiences of FV victimization (described across all pathways) and of dissociative symptoms during the FVE (unique to Pathway 2) suggest that their involvement in FV perpetrator treatment programs should be guided by a trauma-informed approach (Webermann & Murphy, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domestic violence is a social phenomenon with social conditions, culture and family conditions. 1 It is a factor that has determined and nourished the Thai society and other societies for a long time. 2 Moreover, there are several phenomena that reflected the increasing intensity and more complex daily violence resulting in difficulties to prevent and solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their common experiencing of dissociative symptoms during the FVE, and that three FVEs were precipitated by event victims' FV use, participants' victimization histories are an integral part of understanding Pathway 2 FVEs. This finding is supported by a growing body of research demonstrating that a minority of FV perpetrators with trauma histories experience dissociation while perpetrating FV (LaMotte & Murphy, 2017;Simoneti et al, 2000;Webermann & Murphy, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%